Re: [DISCUSS] Diagnostic events in virtual tables

2021-07-24 Thread Mick Semb Wever
> > I am not sure yet how the implementation in case of virtual tables > fits into the overall picture of "pluggability". Yeah, it was a goal of the design to make writing new types as easy as possible, so having to wire up a new vtable for each new event type works against that. I'd be incline

Re: [DISCUSS] Diagnostic events in virtual tables

2021-07-24 Thread Stefan Miklosovic
Yes, limits are good, in case of a solution for virtual tables. I can imagine that it will be use just for the sake of diagnostics what a node is doing and so on and even we lift the limit to something like 1000, that is already a plenty to show a respective operator (as a person) what a node does

Re: [DISCUSS] Diagnostic events in virtual tables

2021-07-24 Thread Mick Semb Wever
Some input… We don't need a CEP for this: Diagnostic Events already exists, as do Virtual Tables. But if you want to take it to a CEP, that's to be encouraged :) Virtual Tables should remain virtual, i.e. they shouldn't be backed by custom system_* tables solely for the sake of persisting the vir