Re: [DISCUSS] Remove support for `test.runners` and `testparallel`

2021-04-12 Thread Brandon Williams
While I'm certain we could push through all these tests to support parallelism, I think it will end up requiring continual work since there is a class of tests that won't always work under concurrency, but also that won't be immediately obvious until the damage is done. I'm +1 on punting to docker

Re: [DISCUSS] Remove support for `test.runners` and `testparallel`

2021-04-12 Thread David Capwell
+1 to remove in favor of CI handling. > On Apr 12, 2021, at 11:16 AM, Mick Semb Wever wrote: > > Cassandra's build.xml supports parallel test runners. This > functionality is available through `-Dtest.runners` and the > `testparallel` ant macro. > > It's always been there, but hasn't been acti

[DISCUSS] Remove support for `test.runners` and `testparallel`

2021-04-12 Thread Mick Semb Wever
Cassandra's build.xml supports parallel test runners. This functionality is available through `-Dtest.runners` and the `testparallel` ant macro. It's always been there, but hasn't been active recently since both ci-cassandra and circleci call testclasslist instead of test. Recently testclasslist

Re: [DISCUSSION] Further question about ARM support for Cassandra

2021-04-12 Thread Mick Semb Wever
Sheng Liu, > The ARM CI will be a gate to ensure long term development support ARM64 in > Cassandra. The servers that Huawei have provided have been instrumental in getting the build and tests running on arm64. This is a huge contribution to the community and I would like to say a big and pub

Re: [DISCUSSION] Further question about ARM support for Cassandra

2021-04-12 Thread Brandon Williams
We have certainly paved the way to publishing ARM-specific artifacts, although we don't currently have any. I do think adding an announcement of ARM support would be beneficial. On Sun, Apr 11, 2021 at 11:03 AM Sheng Liu wrote: > > Hi folks, > > Previously we have promoted to make Cassandra suppo