Thanks all. Really appreciate it :-)
On 27/3/21 0:24, Lorina Poland wrote:
> Just adding more congratulations, Berenguer! Well-deserved!
>
> Lorina Poland
> e. lor...@datastax.com
> w. www.datastax.com
>
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 12:17 PM Yifan Cai wrote:
>
>> Congratulations Berenguer!
>>
>>
> This is not a retrospective change just a clarification on what should be
> self evident.
This is a non-sequitur surely? Can something that is self-evident need
clarifying? Or do you suppose it is self-evident to all besides the feeble
intellects of this community?
I think a self-evident pol
Hi,
> Given the same agreement there that the ASF's docs are unclear on the
> topic, and having to rely upon a post from Roy in *some thread, I think it
> is safe to say we can (if need be) continue until those docs are made up to
> date. Also, I cannot see how the ASF can enforce anything retroac
>
> I thought you had indicated you were anyway raising this with the board?
>
> Either way, I don't personally see any issue with delaying the vote by a
> week or so if it will bring some official clarity to this issue, now it has
> been raised. How quickly can we expect to see changes reflected i
I thought you had indicated you were anyway raising this with the board?
Either way, I don't personally see any issue with delaying the vote by a week
or so if it will bring some official clarity to this issue, now it has been
raised. How quickly can we expect to see changes reflected in the off
HI,
> I recommend that the PMC continues its vote on 4.0-rc1.
In that case I'll need to raise this issue with theASF board.
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
> I can only speak for myself, but I am happy to ensure future releases
> follow this policy once it is clearly stated as an official ASF policy by
> the official policy documentation.
>
+1
I recommend that the PMC continues its vote on 4.0-rc1.
With the understanding that the ASF updates the p
> I guess you are asking for something official from VP Legal Affairs or the
> ASF board? If so I can make that happen.
I would prefer the official policy pages to be updated to have a clear
statement on this, so this problem can be solved in perpetuity.
> IMO it does, the project can choose to
Hi,
> You are probably right, but as far as I am aware you are not an official
> source of ASF policy on this matter.
I am currently assistant VP legal affairs and have made changes to ASF policy
before, in particular to the release and distribution policy. I guess you are
asking for something
Hi Justin,
You are probably right, but as far as I am aware you are not an official source
of ASF policy on this matter. The official policy pages do not stipulate this,
so I would appreciate if you could get them updated to accord more clearly your
beliefs before the project makes the necessar
10 matches
Mail list logo
