Re: Project website analytics

Hi Mick I'm a bit unclear what you're looking for here - someone to donate a server, someone to do admin or both? Or have I missed the point altogether? Cheers Ben --- *Ben Slater**Chief Product Officer*

Re: Project website analytics

> It may help gauge what's needed if we have some kind of ballpark idea > for what kind of resources may be needed for this. (The irony that > having analytics here could tell us is not lost on me.) > > For monthly traffic, if what we're seeing from ASF is a 30-day moving > average, then the site s

Re: Project website analytics

So asf infra has given us a go ahead to do website analytics with a self-hosted plausible.io (with the warning that a forthcoming GDPR policy from the ASF might revert it later on). ref INFRA-20748 > Outstanding! It may help gauge what's needed if we have some kind of ballpark idea for what kind

Re: Minimal 4.0 COMPACT STORAGE backport

Thanks for the reply. Talked with Alex in Slack and I was under the impression deleted rows were handled differently on read. collect ideas about migration, cutoff date and final deprecation in a > separate thread or a document. +1 I am good bringing a subset back to ease upgrades to 4.0 On

Re: Minimal 4.0 COMPACT STORAGE backport

These are some great (albeit somewhat hard) questions! > * when you drop compact storage and have some SSTables stored in compact storage and some SSTables stored normally, how do we present data correctly? There is no difference in SSTable format between normal and compact storage, the differenc

Re: Project website analytics

It may help gauge what's needed if we have some kind of ballpark idea for what kind of resources may be needed for this. (The irony that having analytics here could tell us is not lost on me.) On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 1:09 PM Mick Semb Wever wrote: > > So asf infra has given us a go ahead to do we

Project website analytics

So asf infra has given us a go ahead to do website analytics with a self-hosted plausible.io (with the warning that a forthcoming GDPR policy from the ASF might revert it later on). ref INFRA-20748 A few folk have asked for this, and it would certainly make website updates, blogs and updates much

Re: [DISCUSS] Next steps for Kubernetes operator SIG

Hi everyone, Just a reminder. Our meeting at the top of the hour! https://datastax.zoom.us/j/390839037 Patrick On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 8:46 AM Joshua McKenzie wrote: > I'm a big fan of github milestones for exactly this kind of work. Just as > much process as strictly required to logically gr

Re: Minimal 4.0 COMPACT STORAGE backport

Definitely that is not off the table. Also, we talked this morning for a plan for additional testing to be created as part of CASSANDRA-15588 On Thu, 22 Oct 2020 at 12:33, David Capwell wrote: > I am in favor of bringing it back, but I do feel we should also plan how to > get it removed as well.

Re: Minimal 4.0 COMPACT STORAGE backport

I am in favor of bringing it back, but I do feel we should also plan how to get it removed as well. Few examples, would love to see fleshed out * when you drop compact storage and have some SSTables stored in compact storage and some SSTables stored normally, how do we present data correctly? * d

Re: Minimal 4.0 COMPACT STORAGE backport

Hi Alex, Thanks for bringing this up. I am with you for returning part of the code back and considering this as a bug. I truly believe it is too late in the release to document changed behavior. I think this contradicts with the project’s promise for no breaking changes. This should have been docum

Minimal 4.0 COMPACT STORAGE backport

Since this is an important subject, I thought it also makes sense to start a mailing list thread. You may know that in 4.0 there was a plan to drop compact storage and related code. However, there are several behavioural changes related to compact storage, and difference in visible behaviour betwe