> Just a heads up - this comes across as passive aggressive sniping. I'm sure
> you didn't mean it as such
I think indirect criticism is a normal part of discourse, particularly in
public fora where it can be more polite and less disruptive than direct
criticism. Ironically, this snippet of yo
I wanted to kick off a discussion about outstanding tickets scoped for 4.0
that have unclear scope, as well as a few tickets that are currently marked
with one of the 4.0 fixversions but that we might want to consider as
optional (updating fixversion to 4.x or 4.0.x so they don't show in the
JIRA b
I thought about this a bit more overnight - if I'm arguing that most work
would be fast forward merges to trunk if we branched beta due to the type
of work going into beta, the inverse argument should hold that most merges
into a feature branch would be fast forward or minimal. So I think the
basic
