Re: Idea: Marking required scope for 4.0 GA vs. optional

2020-03-29 Thread Joshua McKenzie
FWIW, I don't care what we go with as long as we can differentiate tickets that are optional for the rel vs. tickets that are blockers and filter the JIRA board on them so people know where they should focus their effort. The rest of it's just paint colors to me. On Sun, Mar 29, 2020 at 9:24 AM M

Re: Idea: Marking required scope for 4.0 GA vs. optional

2020-03-29 Thread Mick Semb Wever
> > Alternatively, we could revert to using 4.0.X or 4.X as we once did to > indicate something is targeting a release vs. blocking on inclusion for it. > That seems to be a more "project JIRA hackish idiom", and one that's > historically been confusing for people. At least with a label it would be

Re: Idea: Marking required scope for 4.0 GA vs. optional

2020-03-29 Thread Stefan Miklosovic
Yeah, the statement "we want to release ASAP" was quite scary to read. Did I miss something? When do we cut GA? ASAP is like next week? What is going on? Help! :D On Sat, 28 Mar 2020 at 22:00, Joshua McKenzie wrote: > > > > since we want to release ASAP > > > Help me understand how to reconcile