Re: [Discuss] num_tokens default in Cassandra 4.0

Thanks for restarting this discussion Jeremy. I personally think 4 is a good number as a default. I think whatever we pick, we should have enough documentation for operators to make sense of the new defaults in 4.0. Dinesh > On Jan 28, 2020, at 9:25 PM, Jeremy Hanna wrote: > > I wanted to s

[Discuss] num_tokens default in Cassandra 4.0

I wanted to start a discussion about the default for num_tokens that we'd like for people starting in Cassandra 4.0. This is for ticket CASSANDRA-13701 (which has been duplicated a number of times, most recently by me). TLDR, based on ava

Re: Next round of releases…

> I think there is also an issue with 3.0.19+ which prevents starting up > Cassandra on Windows at all, thus ideally some sort of fix in that area > would be nice to be included as well. The ticket is CASSANDRA-15426, and we'll wait til a fix is in. -

RE: Next round of releases…

I think there is also an issue with 3.0.19+ which prevents starting up Cassandra on Windows at all, thus ideally some sort of fix in that area would be nice to be included as well. Regards, Thomas -Original Message- From: Mick Semb Wever Sent: Dienstag, 28. Jänner 2020 07:40 To: dev@ca

Re: Next round of releases…

> Jeff brought up yesterday on #cassandra-dev the need for a round of > releases, because of CASSANDRA-15400. > > Does anyone object, or knows of anything in the works that needs to go > into the next releases of 2.2, 3.0, 3.11, or trunk? I'll start the release process over the next few hour