Hi Mick,
Thanks for the feedback. Please find my clarifications inline.
> There's also been suggestions to take a step away from any focus on code and
> go back to documentation and brainstorming. I appreciate the work already
> done in the gdoc, but there's a lot left to the imagination (or ju
Dinesh,
> Most of the discussion and work was done off the mailing list - there's a
> big risk involved when folks disappear for months at a time and resurface
> with big pile of code plus an agenda that you failed to loop everyone in
> on.
Given all the discussions that have been had offline at
Let's pick a default setup that works for most people (IME clusters <
30 nodes, but TLP and Instaclustr peeps probably have the most insight
here).
Then we just explain the heck out of it in the comments. I would also
like to see this include some details add/remove a DC to change the
values (perh
I think this feature is important to the community and I don’t want to
stifle that but if committers/contributors are working on the management
process instead of testing 4.0 it takes away from it regardless of where
the code lives. Waiting to merge until after 4.0, at a minimum, would
benefit the
