That’s a good point. Let’s review the patch and when it is ready to commit, we
can create the repo then.
> On Aug 18, 2018, at 14:04, Stefan Podkowinski wrote:
>
> I think we do have some consensus that 1) we should give it a try to
> have one or many side-car processes for non-essential featu
I think we do have some consensus that 1) we should give it a try to
have one or many side-car processes for non-essential features, and that
2) they should be developed in a separate repo. I'm also open to the
idea of accepting the proposed implementation as a possible side-car
solution and really
The thread for side car is months old and no one has opposed to it and hence
someone developed it. I am not sure how else you get consensus.
Regarding separate repo, how do we get consensus?
> On Aug 18, 2018, at 05:19, Stefan Podkowinski wrote:
>
> I don't see that we have reached sufficien
I don't see that we have reached sufficient consensus on this yet. We've
had a brief discussion about the pros and cons of in-tree cassandra vs
separate ASF repo here, but let's not frame it like it's either or. From
my perspective, there hasn't been any final decision yet whether the
proposed side
