Re: Roadmap for 4.0

2018-04-09 Thread Jeff Beck
If you are going to make 4 bigger as long as we call out that 3.11.x (or whatever) will keep getting patches for stability only that's all that's needed. We haven't gone to 3.x releases many places yet as we wait for a release that will be stable longer. Knowing 4 is going to be bigger I wouldn't w

Re: Roadmap for 4.0

2018-04-09 Thread Josh McKenzie
> > If they're not close to finished now why even consider them for the 4.0 > release? Merging in major features at the end of a release cycle is not the path to stability, imo. On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 4:56 PM, Jonathan Haddad wrote: > There's always more stuff to try to shoehorn in. We've done

Re: Roadmap for 4.0

2018-04-09 Thread Jonathan Haddad
There's always more stuff to try to shoehorn in. We've done big releases with all the things, it never was stable. We tried the opposite end of the spectrum, release every month, that really wasn't great either. Personally I'd be OK with stopping new features by the end of this month and aiming

Re: Roadmap for 4.0

2018-04-09 Thread J. D. Jordan
Myself I would put my non-binding vote for the stable side. I think those are both important, but maybe they are best as some of the first things to go into “release after 4.0”, not the last things to go into 4.0. Maybe they would also prove as some incentive to get the next release out the door

Re: Roadmap for 4.0

2018-04-09 Thread Nate McCall
> I'd like to see pluggable storage and transient replica tickets land, for > starters. I think both those features are, frankly, necessary for our future. On the other hand, they both have the following risks: 1. core behavioral changes 2. require changing a (relatively) large surface area of cod

Re: Roadmap for 4.0

2018-04-09 Thread Jeff Jirsa
I'd like to see pluggable storage and transient replica tickets land, for starters. On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 10:17 AM, Ben Bromhead wrote: > > > > For those wanting to delay, are we just dancing around inclusion of > > some pet features? This is fine, I just think we need to communicate > > what w

Re: Roadmap for 4.0

2018-04-09 Thread Ben Bromhead
> > For those wanting to delay, are we just dancing around inclusion of > some pet features? This is fine, I just think we need to communicate > what we are after if so. > +1 Some solid examples of tickets that won't make it with the proposed timeline and a proposed alternative would help. Otherw

Re: CommitLogSegmentManager verbose debug log

2018-04-09 Thread Nicolas Guyomar
Always interested in helping ! I submitted 2 small patches on 3.11 and trunk Thank you On 8 April 2018 at 01:34, Jay Zhuang wrote: > Make senses to me. Not sure if I should just push a Ninja fix, created > the ticket anyway: CASSANDRA-14370. Are you interested in creating a quick > patch for i