This is a great idea
+1 (non-binding)
On 22 March 2017 at 07:04, Edward Capriolo wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 3:24 PM, Mark Dewey wrote:
>
> > I can immediately think of a project I would use that in. +1
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 12:18 PM Jonathan Haddad
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I creat
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 3:24 PM, Mark Dewey wrote:
> I can immediately think of a project I would use that in. +1
>
> On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 12:18 PM Jonathan Haddad
> wrote:
>
> > I created CASSANDRA-13284 a few days ago with the intent of starting a
> > discussion around the topic of breaking
I can immediately think of a project I would use that in. +1
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 12:18 PM Jonathan Haddad wrote:
> I created CASSANDRA-13284 a few days ago with the intent of starting a
> discussion around the topic of breaking the CQL parser out into a separate
> project. I see a few benef
I created CASSANDRA-13284 a few days ago with the intent of starting a
discussion around the topic of breaking the CQL parser out into a separate
project. I see a few benefits to doing it and was wondering what the folks
here thought as well.
First off, the Java CQL parser would obviously continu
Github user Baddaboo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cassandra/commit/5b8b1ce26cd073a44ddf7c7a6750da409a343eba#commitcomment-21412404
Maybe @belliottsmith was just writing this printout in
[Italian](https://translate.google.com/#eo/en/datata), referring to a
