Re: Summary of 4.0 Large Features/Breaking Changes (Was: Rough roadmap for 4.0)

We are happy to start testing against completed features. Ideally once everything is ready for an RC (to catch interaction bugs), but we can do sooner for features where it make sense and are finished earlier. On Thu, 17 Nov 2016 at 16:47 Nate McCall wrote: > To sum up that other thread (I very

Summary of 4.0 Large Features/Breaking Changes (Was: Rough roadmap for 4.0)

To sum up that other thread (I very much appreciate everyone's input, btw), here is an aggregate list of large, breaking 4.0 proposed changes: CASSANDRA-9425 Immutable node-local schema CASSANDRA-10699 Strongly consistent schema alterations -- CASSANDRA-12229 NIO streaming CASSANDRA-8457 NIO messa

Re: Rough roadmap for 4.0

s/materialised views/aggregates/ also we expect to have our first larger production 3.7 LTS cluster in the next few months. On Thu, 17 Nov 2016 at 15:38 Ben Bromhead wrote: > We have a few small customers clusters running on our 3.7 LTS release... > though we are not calling it production ready

Re: Rough roadmap for 4.0

We have a few small customers clusters running on our 3.7 LTS release... though we are not calling it production ready yet. We also just moved our internal metrics cluster from 2.2 to 3.7 LTS to get materialised views and to get some 3.x production experience. On Thu, 17 Nov 2016 at 14:27 Carlos

Re: Rough roadmap for 4.0

No Cluster in tick-tock. Actually reverted a couple to 3.0.x Regards, Carlos Juzarte Rolo Cassandra Consultant / Datastax Certified Architect / Cassandra MVP Pythian - Love your data rolo@pythian | Twitter: @cjrolo | Skype: cjr2k3 | Linkedin: *linkedin.com/in/carlosjuzarterolo

Re: Rough roadmap for 4.0

Be very careful, there is a serious bug about AND/OR semantics, not solved yet and not going to be solved any soon: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-12674 On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 7:32 PM, Jeff Jirsa wrote: > > We’ll be voting in the very near future on timing of major releases and

Re: Rough roadmap for 4.0

We should continue with 3.X until all the 4.0 blockers have been >> committed - and there are quite a few of them remaining yet. > > And… are we right to presume that all the "roadmap 4.0" issues that don't break any compatibility will be released in the 3.X tock releases leading up to 4.0?

Re: Rough roadmap for 4.0

@Jeff "But since you asked, I have ONE tick/tock (3.9) cluster being qualified for production because it needs SASI." You are brave :) On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 10:32 AM, Jeff Jirsa wrote: > > We’ll be voting in the very near future on timing of major releases and > release strategy. 4.0 won’t hap

Re: Rough roadmap for 4.0

We’ll be voting in the very near future on timing of major releases and release strategy. 4.0 won’t happen until that vote takes place. But since you asked, I have ONE tick/tock (3.9) cluster being qualified for production because it needs SASI. - Jeff On 11/17/16, 9:59 AM, "Jonathan Haddad"

Re: Rough roadmap for 4.0

I think it might be worth considering adopting the release strategy before 4.0 release. Are any PMC members putting tick tock in prod? Does anyone even trust it? What's the downside of changing the release cycle independently from 4.0? On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 9:03 AM Jason Brown wrote: Jason,

Re: Rough roadmap for 4.0

Jason, That's a separate topic, but we will have a different vote on how the branching/release strategy should be for the future. On Thursday, November 17, 2016, jason zhao yang wrote: > Hi, > > Will we still use tick-tock release for 4.x and 4.0.x ? > > Stefan Podkowinski >于2016年11月16日周三 > 下午4

Re: Board report and feedback from such.

On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 10:30 PM, Ben Bromhead wrote: > Thanks Nate, this is great to see this get some visibility on a wider > distribution list like dev! Full ACK; Thanks for sending this to the list Nate! -- Eric Evans john.eric.ev...@gmail.com

Re: [RELEASE] Apache Cassandra 3.0.10 released

On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 9:17 PM, Michael Shuler wrote: > > The Cassandra team is pleased to announce the release of Apache > Cassandra version 3.0.10. > > Apache Cassandra is a fully distributed database. It is the right choice > when you need scalability and high availability without compromising

Re: Rough roadmap for 4.0

Hi, Will we still use tick-tock release for 4.x and 4.0.x ? Stefan Podkowinski 于2016年11月16日周三 下午4:52写道： > From my understanding, this will also effect EOL dates of other branches. > > "We will maintain the 2.2 stability series until 4.0 is released, and 3.0 > for six months after that.". > > > O