===
testall: All passed!
===
dtest: 2 failures
scrub_test.TestScrubIndexes.test_standalone_scrub
CASSANDRA-12337. I've root-caused this; the failure is cosmetic
but user-facing, so I plan on f
Agreed, I’d rather discuss the details on JIRA. It might be nice to send
another email describing whatever conclusion we come to, after we have
everything hashed out.
> On Aug 24, 2016, at 4:09 PM, Paulo Motta wrote:
>
> Thanks for sharing this! I added some comments/suggestions on the ticket
Thanks for sharing this! I added some comments/suggestions on the ticket
for those interested.
On a side note, it's still not clear if we should do the discussion here on
the dev-list or just call attention for a particular issue/ticket and then
continue discussion on JIRA, but I find the latter m
Hi everyone,
I just posted a proposed solution to some issues with incremental repair in
CASSANDRA-9143. The solution involves non-trivial changes to the way
incremental repair works, so I’m giving it a shout out on the dev list in the
spirit of increasing the flow of information here.
Summary
Thanks for the resources!
On 24.08.2016 21:27, DuyHai Doan wrote:
You can read this blog post, there are a handful of interesting links:
http://the-paper-trail.org/blog/distributed-systems-theory-for-the-distributed-systems-engineer/
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 1:45 PM, Salih Gedik wrote:
Hi ev
No worries. It was a somewhat.. messy thread.
And it’s taken us a while to get the tests to this level, so it’s somewhat far
away in time in the past.
--
AY
On 24 August 2016 at 20:43:39, Mark Thomas (ma...@apache.org) wrote:
On 24/08/2016 20:26, Aleksey Yeschenko wrote:
> No. Removing a de
On 24/08/2016 20:26, Aleksey Yeschenko wrote:
> No. Removing a dead branch is just mindless admin work.
>
> As for 3.8/3.9 plans, look up the previous quite lengthy vote discussion on
> 3.8, on dev.
Thanks. Found it. Just need to go back a little further in the archive.
Mark
>
> --
> AY
>
>
It's basically just removing a tag, nothing more. Completely trivial.
---
On 2016-08-24 15:22, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 24/08/2016 16:44, Aleksey Yeschenko wrote:
Also, cassandra-3.8 branch was removed from the repo, to further
minimise confusion.
That is the sort of thing I'd expect to see
No. Removing a dead branch is just mindless admin work.
As for 3.8/3.9 plans, look up the previous quite lengthy vote discussion on
3.8, on dev.
--
AY
On 24 August 2016 at 20:23:04, Mark Thomas (ma...@apache.org) wrote:
On 24/08/2016 16:44, Aleksey Yeschenko wrote:
> Also, cassandra-3.
On 24/08/2016 16:44, Aleksey Yeschenko wrote:
> Also, cassandra-3.8 branch was removed from the repo, to further minimise
> confusion.
That is the sort of thing I'd expect to see discussed on the dev list
first. Where is that discussion?
Mark
You can read this blog post, there are a handful of interesting links:
http://the-paper-trail.org/blog/distributed-systems-theory-for-the-distributed-systems-engineer/
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 1:45 PM, Salih Gedik wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> I am an undergrad student and working on a simple distribut
Correction: s/12528/11195/g. I’m an idiot who cannot copy-paste.
Also, cassandra-3.8 branch was removed from the repo, to further minimise
confusion.
--
AY
On 24 August 2016 at 16:25:21, Aleksey Yeschenko (alek...@apache.org) wrote:
TL;DR: cassandra-3.8 branch is dead; cassandra-3.9 is frozen
TL;DR: cassandra-3.8 branch is dead; cassandra-3.9 is frozen, unless you are
committing the fix for #12140 or #12528.
For everything else go cassandra-3.0 -> trunk.
There has been some confusion regarding the current branch merge order that I’d
like to clarify.
As you’ve seen from Joel’s last e
Hi everyone,
I am an undergrad student and working on a simple distributed database for
learning purposes. I was wondering if you guys can give me tips about designing
and coding distributed no master nodes. For instance what classes should I be
looking for in source code? I am so sorry if this
14 matches
Mail list logo
