Hi,
I realized one of the documents we didn't send out was the infrastructure
side changes I am looking for. This one is maybe a little rougher as it was
the first one I wrote on the subject.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Seku0vPwChbnH3uYYxon0UO-b6LDtSqluZiH--sWWi0/edit?usp=sharing
The goa
+1 to this general proposal. I think the time has finally come for us to
try something new, and this sounds legit. Thanks!
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 12:49 AM, Phil Yang wrote:
> Can I regard the odd version as the "development preview" and the even
> version as the "production ready"?
>
> IMO, as
Can I regard the odd version as the "development preview" and the even
version as the "production ready"?
IMO, as a database infrastructure project, "stable" is more important than
other kinds of projects. LTS is a good idea, but if we don't support
non-LTS releases for enough time to fix their bu
