On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 5:18 PM, Tilmann Rabl
wrote:
> I have a question related to Cassandra views. With a student, I have
> implemented a materialized views for Cassandra in version 2.0. The student
> left and I am trying to upgrade his code to the current version. I have
> noticed that the way
UPDATE foo SET x = x + 1
is inherently not idempotent. Thus, client-based idempotence is not in
fact a design goal.
What 2.1 achieves is making commitlog replay idempotent.
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 3:44 AM, Rajath Subramanyam
wrote:
> Hi Aleksey,
>
> Thanks for the response. I read through sev
