+1
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 9:44 AM, Sylvain Lebresne wrote:
> So, seems like CASSANDRA-6924 was kind of a false alarm. And since I've
> never dropped
> the artifacts and no commit has been done on 1.2 since then, I propose to
> just resurrect the
> vote. Since the vote had initially ran for 2 da
+1
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 11:01 AM, Gary Dusbabek wrote:
> +1
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 9:44 AM, Sylvain Lebresne >wrote:
>
> > So, seems like CASSANDRA-6924 was kind of a false alarm. And since I've
> > never dropped
> > the artifacts and no commit has been done on 1.2 since then, I prop
+1
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 9:44 AM, Sylvain Lebresne wrote:
> So, seems like CASSANDRA-6924 was kind of a false alarm. And since I've
> never dropped
> the artifacts and no commit has been done on 1.2 since then, I propose to
> just resurrect the
> vote. Since the vote had initially ran for 2 da
+1
On Mar 27, 2014 7:46 AM, "Sylvain Lebresne" wrote:
> So, seems like CASSANDRA-6924 was kind of a false alarm. And since I've
> never dropped
> the artifacts and no commit has been done on 1.2 since then, I propose to
> just resurrect the
> vote. Since the vote had initially ran for 2 days, I'm
So, seems like CASSANDRA-6924 was kind of a false alarm. And since I've
never dropped
the artifacts and no commit has been done on 1.2 since then, I propose to
just resurrect the
vote. Since the vote had initially ran for 2 days, I'm going to propose
that we only extend for
just 24h more hours (pro
