Alright, so consider this vote closed for now.
On May 7, 2013 9:27 PM, "Jonathan Ellis" wrote:
> Agreed that this is a big enough regression to re-roll after fixing.
>
> On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 11:27 AM, Jake Luciani wrote:
> > There is a issue with
> >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/C
Agreed that this is a big enough regression to re-roll after fixing.
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 11:27 AM, Jake Luciani wrote:
> There is a issue with
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-4860
>
> There is a workaround but it should probably be fixed before 1.2.5 comes
> out.
>
>
> On T
There is a issue with
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-4860
There is a workaround but it should probably be fixed before 1.2.5 comes
out.
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
> +1
>
> On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 3:15 AM, Sylvain Lebresne
> wrote:
> > Now that the o
+1
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 3:15 AM, Sylvain Lebresne wrote:
> Now that the offending tickets have been committed (#5432 and #5535), let's
> re-roll this. So I propose the following artifacts for release as 1.2.5.
>
> sha1: 59bd0e7169c5fabc0e734ccbbbcd6964709577d0
> Git:
> http://git-wip-us.apache.
+1
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 10:30 PM, Carl Yeksigian wrote:
> +1
>
>
> On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 4:15 AM, Sylvain Lebresne >wrote:
>
> > Now that the offending tickets have been committed (#5432 and #5535),
> let's
> > re-roll this. So I propose the following artifacts for release as 1.2.5.
> >
> >
