On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 6:48 PM, Michael Alan Dorman <
mdor...@ironicdesign.com> wrote:
> paul cannon writes:
>
> As the doc says, each is a [bytes], which means it's represented
> > on the wire as an [int] x followed by x bytes.
>
> Thank you for pointing out what I had succeeded in reading rep
paul cannon writes:
> It has the same structure as a string map, but might not necessarily *be* a
> string map. I would guess that this phrasing is used because it may be
> possible to have multiple identical "keys" in this structure, which would
> not make sense in a [string map]. (Although I don
I can't usefully speak to your other questions, but the answers to the
technical questions are below.
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 1:16 PM, Michael Alan Dorman <
mdor...@ironicdesign.com> wrote:
> * 4.1.2. CREDENTIALS
>
> My quick clarification is from this bit of text:
>
> The body is a list of ke
Hey, all,
I've been working on a greenfield Perl client for the CQL Binary
Protocol. Since this is a client-in-progress, and my question
is actually about the protocol, I guessed dev@ seemed like the better
list, but please let me know if I should relocate to client-dev@.
As always happens when
