Build failed in Jenkins: Cassandra-0.8 #27

See -- Started by an SCM change Building remotely on ubuntu2 hudson.util.IOException2: remote file operation failed: at hudson.remoting.Channe

Jenkins build is back to normal : Cassandra-0.8 #26

See

Build failed in Jenkins: Cassandra-0.8 #25

See Changes: [jbellis] add decompose methods to new-since-0.7 AbstractTypes patch by jbellis -- [...truncated 1997 lines...] [junit] Testsuite: org.apache.cassandra.db.TimeSortTest [ju

[VOTE] Apache Cassandra 0.8.0-beta1 (take #2)

Let's try this again. I propose the following artifacts for release as 0.8.0 beta1. You will note the addition of three new artifacts, cql-1.0.0.tar.gz, txcql-1.0.0.tar.gz and apache-cassandra-cql-1.0.0.jar. These are language drivers for CQL; Be sure to include them in your review. SVN: https

[VOTE CLOSED] was: [VOTE] Apache Cassandra 0.8.0-beta1

On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 19:13 -0500, Jonathan Ellis wrote: > My fault, fixed. (Built w/ "ant" but it was confused as "ant clean" > demonstrated.) OK, then consider this vote closed all, I'll reopen another shortly. > On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 7:04 PM, Eric Evans wrote: > > On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 16:

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cassandra 0.8.0-beta1

Unfortunate as it means beta1 is useless for testing for us, but I guess it does not make much difference if we try 0.8 trunk instead. Terje On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 9:46 PM, Jonathan Ellis wrote: > We typically only block betas for major regressions, not bugs that are > already present in a rel

Jenkins build is back to stable : Cassandra-0.7-Coverage #30

See

Jenkins build is back to stable : Cassandra-Coverage #32

See

Jenkins build is back to stable : Cassandra-0.8-Coverage #7

See

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cassandra 0.8.0-beta1

My fault, fixed. (Built w/ "ant" but it was confused as "ant clean" demonstrated.) On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 7:04 PM, Eric Evans wrote: > On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 16:59 -0500, Jonathan Ellis wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Eric Evans wrote: >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASS

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cassandra 0.8.0-beta1

On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 16:59 -0500, Jonathan Ellis wrote: > On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Eric Evans wrote: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-2501 > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-2488 > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-2505 > > https://issu

Limitations on number of secondary indexes

I apologize if this has been answered before, I've tried to do some pretty exhaustive searching of the archives and haven't been able to see if this question has been answered before. I was wondering if anyone knows if there is a practical upper limit on the number of secondary indexes used, if th

Build failed in Jenkins: Cassandra-0.8 #24

See Changes: [jbellis] fix merging r1088800 from 0.7 [jbellis] update word count example for KsDef changes patch by jhanna; reviewed by jbellis for CASSANDRA-2510 -- [...truncated 964 lines..

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cassandra 0.8.0-beta1

On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Eric Evans wrote: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-2501 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-2488 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-2505 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-2507 > > All of those apply to

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cassandra 0.8.0-beta1

On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 07:46 -0500, Jonathan Ellis wrote: > We typically only block betas for major regressions, not bugs that are > already present in a released version (all of 0.7 releases in this > case). So yes, this will be in the next one after beta1 (probably rc1 > since 0.8 won't be a movi

Jenkins build is back to normal : Cassandra-0.8 #21

See

Jenkins build is back to normal : Cassandra-0.7 #447

See

Build failed in Jenkins: Cassandra-0.8 #20

See Changes: [slebresne] Make scrub validate column fields patch by slebresne; reviewed by jbellis for CASSANDRA-2460 -- [...truncated 1954 lines...] [junit] [junit] Testsuite: org.ap

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cassandra 0.8.0-beta1

+1 On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 3:10 PM, Stephen Connolly wrote: > FYI: http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes > Releases may not be vetoed > > On 19 April 2011 13:42, Shotaro Kamio wrote: >> -1, >> I'd like to make 0.8 to include the fix for CASSANDRA-2406. The fix is >> committed

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cassandra 0.8.0-beta1

FYI: http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes Releases may not be vetoed On 19 April 2011 13:42, Shotaro Kamio wrote: > -1, > I'd like to make 0.8 to include the fix for CASSANDRA-2406. The fix is > committed to the 0.8 branch lately. I'll wait for beta2. > > > Regards, > Shotaro

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cassandra 0.8.0-beta1

We typically only block betas for major regressions, not bugs that are already present in a released version (all of 0.7 releases in this case). So yes, this will be in the next one after beta1 (probably rc1 since 0.8 won't be a moving target like 0.7 was). On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 7:42 AM, Shotar

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cassandra 0.8.0-beta1

-1, I'd like to make 0.8 to include the fix for CASSANDRA-2406. The fix is committed to the 0.8 branch lately. I'll wait for beta2. Regards, Shotaro On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 10:42 AM, Jonathan Ellis wrote: > CASSANDRA-2448 means https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-2448 > > On Mon, A

Jenkins build is back to normal : Cassandra-0.8 #19

See

Jenkins build is back to normal : Cassandra #856

See

Build failed in Jenkins: Cassandra-0.7 #446

See -- Started by an SCM change Building remotely on ubuntu1 hudson.util.IOException2: remote file operation failed: at hudson.remoting.Chann

Re: [VOTE] Promote extra-enforcer-rules out of the sandbox and release version 1.0-alpha-1

Sorry never mind the spam... stupid GMail autocomplete! On 19 April 2011 10:22, Stephen Connolly wrote: > Hi Mojo developers, > > I'd like to promote the extra-enforcer-rules subproject out of the sandbox and > release version 1.0-alpha-1 > > This sub-project is designed to allow for hosting of c

[VOTE] Promote extra-enforcer-rules out of the sandbox and release version 1.0-alpha-1

Hi Mojo developers, I'd like to promote the extra-enforcer-rules subproject out of the sandbox and release version 1.0-alpha-1 This sub-project is designed to allow for hosting of custom rules for the enforcer plugin. The project site is deployed at: http://mojo.codehaus.org/extra-enforcer-ru