Re: [VOTE] 0.7.2

2011-02-15 Thread Sylvain Lebresne
+1 On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 10:57 PM, Eric Evans wrote: > > CASSANDRA-2165[1] is troublesome enough to warrant a new release. I > propose the following for 0.7.2. > > SVN: > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cassandra/branches/cassandra-0.7.2@r1071063 > 0.7.2 artifacts: http://people.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] 0.7.2

2011-02-15 Thread Jonathan Ellis
+1 On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 3:57 PM, Eric Evans wrote: > > CASSANDRA-2165[1] is troublesome enough to warrant a new release.  I > propose the following for 0.7.2. > > SVN: > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cassandra/branches/cassandra-0.7.2@r1071063 > 0.7.2 artifacts: http://people.apache.org/~ee

Re: [VOTE] 0.7.2

2011-02-15 Thread Stephen Connolly
On 15 February 2011 21:57, Eric Evans wrote: > > CASSANDRA-2165[1] is troublesome enough to warrant a new release.  I > propose the following for 0.7.2. > > SVN: > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cassandra/branches/cassandra-0.7.2@r1071063 > 0.7.2 artifacts: http://people.apache.org/~eevans > > T

Re: [VOTE] 0.7.2

2011-02-15 Thread Stephen Connolly
On 15 February 2011 22:20, Stephen Connolly wrote: > On 15 February 2011 22:19, Stephen Connolly > wrote: >> On 15 February 2011 22:18, Stephen Connolly >> wrote: >>> On 15 February 2011 21:57, Eric Evans wrote: CASSANDRA-2165[1] is troublesome enough to warrant a new release.  I

Re: [VOTE] 0.7.2

2011-02-15 Thread Stephen Connolly
On 15 February 2011 22:19, Stephen Connolly wrote: > On 15 February 2011 22:18, Stephen Connolly > wrote: >> On 15 February 2011 21:57, Eric Evans wrote: >>> >>> CASSANDRA-2165[1] is troublesome enough to warrant a new release.  I >>> propose the following for 0.7.2. >>> >>> SVN: >>> https://svn

Re: [VOTE] 0.7.2

2011-02-15 Thread Gary Dusbabek
+1 On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 15:57, Eric Evans wrote: > > CASSANDRA-2165[1] is troublesome enough to warrant a new release.  I > propose the following for 0.7.2. > > SVN: > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cassandra/branches/cassandra-0.7.2@r1071063 > 0.7.2 artifacts: http://people.apache.org/~eeva

Re: [VOTE] 0.7.2

2011-02-15 Thread Stephen Connolly
On 15 February 2011 22:18, Stephen Connolly wrote: > On 15 February 2011 21:57, Eric Evans wrote: >> >> CASSANDRA-2165[1] is troublesome enough to warrant a new release.  I >> propose the following for 0.7.2. >> >> SVN: >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cassandra/branches/cassandra-0.7.2@r10710

Re: [VOTE] 0.7.2

2011-02-15 Thread Stephen Connolly
On 15 February 2011 21:57, Eric Evans wrote: > > CASSANDRA-2165[1] is troublesome enough to warrant a new release.  I > propose the following for 0.7.2. > > SVN: > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cassandra/branches/cassandra-0.7.2@r1071063 Minor niggle, that revision has the build.xml with base.

Re: [VOTE] 0.7.2

2011-02-15 Thread Jake Luciani
+1 On Feb 15, 2011, at 4:57 PM, Eric Evans wrote: > > CASSANDRA-2165[1] is troublesome enough to warrant a new release. I > propose the following for 0.7.2. > > SVN: > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cassandra/branches/cassandra-0.7.2@r1071063 > 0.7.2 artifacts: http://people.apache.org/~

Re: [VOTE] 0.7.2

2011-02-15 Thread Matthew Dennis
+1 On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 3:55 PM, Brandon Williams wrote: > +1 > > On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 3:57 PM, Eric Evans wrote: > > > > > CASSANDRA-2165[1] is troublesome enough to warrant a new release. I > > propose the following for 0.7.2. > > > > SVN: > > > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cas

Re: [VOTE] 0.7.2

2011-02-15 Thread Brandon Williams
+1 On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 3:57 PM, Eric Evans wrote: > > CASSANDRA-2165[1] is troublesome enough to warrant a new release. I > propose the following for 0.7.2. > > SVN: > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cassandra/branches/cassandra-0.7.2@r1071063 > 0.7.2 artifacts: http://people.apache.org/

[VOTE] 0.7.2

2011-02-15 Thread Eric Evans
CASSANDRA-2165[1] is troublesome enough to warrant a new release. I propose the following for 0.7.2. SVN: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cassandra/branches/cassandra-0.7.2@r1071063 0.7.2 artifacts: http://people.apache.org/~eevans The delta here is pretty small, so if no one objects, we can r

Hudson build is back to normal : Cassandra-0.7 #280

2011-02-15 Thread Apache Hudson Server
See

Build failed in Hudson: Cassandra-0.7 #279

2011-02-15 Thread Apache Hudson Server
See Changes: [jbellis] use duplicate() to indicate that we're not modifying BB.position patch by jbellis -- [...truncated 1613 lines...] [junit] [junit] Testsuite: org.apache.cassand

Build failed in Hudson: Cassandra-0.7 #278

2011-02-15 Thread Apache Hudson Server
See Changes: [jbellis] no more waiting for RPC_TIMEOUT before finishing RR patch by jbellis; reviewed by brandonwilliams for CASSANDRA-2069 -- [...truncated 1613 lines...] [junit] [j