On Thu, 2011-01-20 at 21:14 +, Stephen Connolly wrote:
> so to be clear, april 9th is feature complete for 0.8.0 and then start
> stabilisation...
Yes
> ...and when might we see a 0.7.1
Before then. Well before. Soon.
--
Eric Evans
eev...@rackspace.com
so to be clear, april 9th is feature complete for 0.8.0 and then start
stabilisation... and when might we see a 0.7.1
or am I completely confused?
...
trying to plan splitting the jar into parts, and delivering ever build
tweaks for allowing abny dev to push release to central repository ;-)
-
On Thu, 2011-01-20 at 10:19 -0800, Ryan King wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 8:39 AM, Eric Evans wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 10:29 -0600, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
> >> On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 12:36 PM, Eric Evans wrote:
> >> > The discussion seems to be petering out and I wonder if that means
On Thu, 2011-01-20 at 10:19 -0800, Ryan King wrote:
> Seems reasonable to me, though I think the release date can be a bit
> more flexible (while the freeze date shouldn't be). In other words, if
> we feature freeze and branch on April 9th, then we're ready to ship
> before May 9th, we should just
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 8:39 AM, Eric Evans wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 10:29 -0600, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 12:36 PM, Eric Evans wrote:
>> > The discussion seems to be petering out and I wonder if that means folks
>> > are still trying to wrap their heads around every
On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 10:29 -0600, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 12:36 PM, Eric Evans wrote:
> > The discussion seems to be petering out and I wonder if that means folks
> > are still trying to wrap their heads around everything, or if we have
> > consensus.
> >
> > If we're in a
(I considered user@ but I don't want to cause confusion so limiting
myself to dev@)
I would like to clarify/confirm a few things so that I understand
correctly and so that I can update the documentation to be clearer. I
was unsure about some of these things until code inspection. (If I
have totall
