Re: Reducing confusion around client libraries

+1. I say go for it. On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 11:27, Peter Schuller wrote: > Without weighing in on the remainder of the discussion; regardless of > what happens what do people think about at least making some minor > structural changes to e.g. the wiki? For example, putting the Thrift > API in a s

Re: Reducing confusion around client libraries

I think that much at least is uncontroversial. Go for it. On Dec 4, 2010 11:27 AM, "Peter Schuller" wrote: > Without weighing in on the remainder of the discussion; regardless of > what happens what do people think about at least making some minor > structural changes to e.g. the wiki? For example

Re: Reducing confusion around client libraries

Without weighing in on the remainder of the discussion; regardless of what happens what do people think about at least making some minor structural changes to e.g. the wiki? For example, putting the Thrift API in a section other than the "user documentation", and being pretty vocal (to the point of

Build failed in Hudson: Cassandra-0.7 #51

See Changes: [jbellis] fix botched merge of CASSANDRA-1316 -- [...truncated 1580 lines...] [junit] Cobertura: Loaded information on 961 classes. [junit] Cobertura: Saved information on