Re: CASSANDRA-1472 (bitmap indexes)

No problem. I'll do the test on Monday. On Nov 14, 2010 2:35 AM, "Stu Hood" wrote: > Is it worth testing 0.7-branch-without-1472 to make sure of that? Dragos: if you have time, this would be helpful. If you already have a KEYS index created, you shouldn't need to re-load the data, as the file fo

Re: CASSANDRA-1472 (bitmap indexes)

> Is it worth testing 0.7-branch-without-1472 to make sure of that? Dragos: if you have time, this would be helpful. If you already have a KEYS index created, you shouldn't need to re-load the data, as the file format hasn't changed. Thanks, Stu On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 4:40 PM, Jonathan Ellis wr

Re: CASSANDRA-1472 (bitmap indexes)

Is it worth testing 0.7-branch-without-1472 to make sure of that? On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 10:28 AM, Stu Hood wrote: > Great, thanks for the variable Dragos: I'm fairly sure I broke this in the > refactoring I did in 1472 to fit in a second index type. > > > On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 4:03 AM, dragos

Hudson build is back to normal : Cassandra #595

See