[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1697800] Re: [regression] firefox dies with SIGILL on machines without SSE2

2018-07-27 Thread hackerb9
Nearly a year later, this is still an immediate problem. For people finding this bug via Google, the only fix I've found that cares about security is to use Debian GNU/Linux instead of Ubuntu and `apt install firefox-esr`. This works because the stable (Stretch) version of Debian uses Firefox-ESR 5

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1698501] Re: Please package a version of Firefox without SSE2

2017-06-16 Thread hackerb9
In Bug 1697800 Seth Arnold points out that the upgrade tools are not in a position to check architecture features before installation. While I don't know the best (least worst?) solution, here are some ideas. Option A) Compile the SSE2 parts of Firefox in a separate library and place it in /usr/li

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1697800] Re: [regression] firefox dies with SIGILL on machines without SSE2

2017-06-16 Thread hackerb9
Seth writes, "running a known-insecure webbrowser is probably a bad idea." Agreed. Except I would say "definitely". It's important that Ubuntu gets some sort of a fix soon. I've already seen a person asking on a forum how to downgrade and being told to install a third party package by hand. This

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1697800] Re: [regression] firefox dies with SIGILL on machines without SSE2

2017-06-16 Thread hackerb9
By the way, since this problem is already causing Ubuntu LTS systems to break, it may make sense to implement a quick stopgap solution. One possibility is to change the version of Firefox in 16.04 to "firefox- esr" (Extended Support Release). While this release will only be supported by Mozilla unt

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1698501] [NEW] Please package a version of Firefox without SSE2

2017-06-16 Thread hackerb9
Public bug reported: As has been noted in Bug 1697800, Firefox now dies on machines which Ubuntu still supports (i686). This is a critical problem as Firefox was the only modern web browser that did not require the SSE2 extensions and Ubuntu has committed to long term support for machines without

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1697800] Re: [regression] firefox dies with SIGILL on machines without SSE2

2017-06-16 Thread hackerb9
It looks like this has been in the works for awhile and Mozilla had intended for Firefox to detect SSE2 support in the installer and in the automatic updates. Of course, Ubuntu is skipping both of those. https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1308167 It's urgent that this gets fixed. The

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1697800] Re: [regression] firefox dies with SIGILL on machines without SSE2

2017-06-16 Thread hackerb9
You can trigger a crash immediately on a machine without SSE2 by running firefox 54 like so: firefox https://www.quirksmode.org/html5/videos/big_buck_bunny.mp4 (Note that it must be an mp4 video. VP8 and Vorbis still work fine.) -- You received this bug notification because you are a membe

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1697800] Re: [regression] firefox dies with SIGILL on machines without SSE2

2017-06-15 Thread hackerb9
Spoke too soon. Firefox does still die of SIGILL, it just doesn't die immediately. It is still choking on an SSE2 instruction, though, so this is the same bug. Thread 1 "firefox" received signal SIGILL, Illegal instruction. 0xb20eab29 in ?? () from /usr/lib/firefox/libxul.so => 0xb20ea

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1697800] Re: [regression] firefox dies with SIGILL on machines without SSE2

2017-06-15 Thread hackerb9
I tried the version the version just released, 54.0+build3-0ubuntu0.16.04.1, and it appears Firefox is working again on a machine without SSE2. Thank you! I don't see anything in 'apt changelog firefox' describing what was done to fix it, though. Was it recompiled with different flags? This isn't

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1697800] [NEW] firefox dies with SIGILL on machines without SSE2

2017-06-13 Thread hackerb9
Public bug reported: I'm running Ubuntu 16.04 on an old laptop. Firefox used to work on fine until I did an 'apt upgrade'. Worked: 50.1.0+build2-0ubuntu0.16.04.1 Fails: 53.0.3+build1-0ubuntu0.16.04.2 The bug was a little tricky to track down since AppArmor was killing firefox. I believe the App

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1653691] Re: "Failed with an unknown error" could be more helpful

2017-01-05 Thread hackerb9
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 811516 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/811516 Hi Vej, That bug is similar, but I don't think it's a duplicate. In the bug from five years ago, the request is to make the Unknown Error less intimidating by doing things like hiding the traceback. To be cl

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1653691] [NEW] "Failed with an unknown error" could be more helpful

2017-01-03 Thread hackerb9
Public bug reported: I used Deja Dup for the first time today. I like that Deja Dup is usable by neophytes and newbies. Unfortunately, when it fails, which it did for me, it leaves a rather sour impression. In particular, I'm referring to Deja Dup's infamous "FAILED WITH AN UNKNOWN ERROR" followe

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 841909] Re: Pulseaudio does not play in virtual console

2013-12-09 Thread hackerb9
I also have this bug, though on a multi-user system. I have one user who likes to play "DJ" and leave her music running while another is working at the console. Unfortunately, since PulseAudio pauses as soon as they switch accounts they have decided to work around the problem by not switching accou

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 977804] Re: Unity crashes when many windows are opened (intel_do_flush_locked failed: No space left on device)

2013-08-25 Thread hackerb9
Did this ever get fixed? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/977804 Title: Unity crashes when many windows are opened (intel_do_flush_locked failed: No space left on device)