*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 580961 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/580961
This is what we call Distributed Bureaucracy out of Centralized Anarchy!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to file-roller in Ubuntu.
http
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1871262 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1871262
I comment here because I can reproduce the issue and want to add more
specifics.
The issue happened since upgrade to 21.04 dev branch with gnome-shell
both on Wayland and Xorg. It appears occasionally, not
Same issue appears on Ubuntu 20.10 (only since recent couple of days)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-screensaver in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1458158
Title:
Lock Screen Closes Applications
Status i
I confirm that also happens in firefox 57 on Ubuntu 17.10.
Firefox: 57.0
Ubuntu: 17.10
Gnome-shell 3.26.2
xwayland:2:1.19.5-0ubuntu2
PS I noticed there is a '-v' option for wayland that runs with "screen-
saver without video blanking". Is that helpful?
--
You received this bug notification beca
It's Nov 2017 and gnome 3.26 now. The bug is reborn. Where did the 'fix'
go? Why can't these bugs be quarantined since the fixes were done? The
same bugs were fixed once and brought back always on the same project,
over and over again. It seems the whole community are trying so hard to
maintain all
I have the same problem ever since upgrading to Ubuntu 12.10.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gtk+2.0 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1075928
Title:
Please, silence IA__gdk_error_trap_pop: assertion `gdk_erro
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 47958 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/47958
Now there is no /etc/gdm/Xsession. So is it not appropriate to adopt the
workaround as proposed in #21 ?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed
Public bug reported:
Since upgrade to Quantal, Ubuntu keeps printing the warning 'GLib-
CRITICAL **: g_variant_new_string: assertion `string != NULL' failed' on
every opened gtk application. I don't know where it comes from. Someone
said it may be related to canberra and/or canberra-pixbuf packag
** Attachment added: "xorg.conf"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1060886/+attachment/3367939/+files/xorg.conf
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to lightdm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1060886
Title:
lightdm
Public bug reported:
While most desktop users start gnome-session through lightdm login,
lightdm does not pass DISPLAY DPI setting in /etc/X11/xorg.conf to the
started gnome-session. I can see relative keywords in
/var/log/Xorg.0.log indicating DPI setting is adopted by Xserver, and
I see big fo
It's ridiculous the bug affects me today when updating to compiz
0.9.8.4, regression? again ?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to metacity in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1035261
Title:
Port compiz to gsettings a
No, It affects my Acer laptop too. Gnome-settings-daemon crashes when
pressing Fn+left/right arrows, which in my case is the XFree86 key to
control LCD brightness. However Fn+up/down arrows which is for volume
control works normally. I'm working on Ubuntu 12.10, amd64.
By the way, why do I see a l
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1058451
Title:
gnome-power-manager suspends my system when wget is running
Status in “gnome-power-manager” package in Ubuntu
Public bug reported:
Gnome-power-manager is supposed to facilitate better power usage. But it
proves it's stupid. It's stupid because it make my system suspended when
I was downloading important files using wget. I see very clearly in the
preference page of gnome-power-manager that it promises the
Today is 19th Sep., no positive change.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to glib2.0 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1046699
Title:
Paths starting with '/apps/', '/desktop/' or '/system/' are deprecated
Status in
I know what's going on here. It seems fontconfig requires now one rule
applies to one pattern.
I rewritten the above codes in a 'separted' form, one pattern per font,
everything goes fine.
Yeah, users should be OK with this, except that it makes linux people
more and more stupid.
still no. language-selector 0.87
$~leafpad
Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/41-arphic-ukai.conf", line 16: Having
multiple in isn't supported and may not works as expected
Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/41-arphic-ukai.conf", line 16: Having
multiple in isn't supported and may
one of the most creative thing of linux developers is, they are very
good at transforming a bug into a feature.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to lightdm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/857651
Title:
Unable to
Today is 2012.07.20. I'm using Ubuntu 12.04, and I still ran across this
bug.
One who have used Ubuntu for years would say this is the typical linux story:
the same bug appears repeatedly, developers
being confident everytime they found a workaround claimed as a fix, and being
forgetful everytim
same here. Disgusting dpkg dependences, Irresponsible packagers .
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-icon-theme in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/832235
Title:
package gnome-icon-theme 2.31.0-0ubuntu2 failed
Nope, the problem is, several months ago the Natty users CAN install
gnome-shell from the gnome3 ppa, and in fact many of them did install
gnome-shell from the gnome3 ppa, whereas now they CAN NOT. The same
gnome3 ppa still exists and one can see all the package lists on their
web page, but apt-get
21 matches
Mail list logo
