(In reply to bugzilla2 from comment #49)
So guess we would add additional bracketing for a 25% increment in scale
factoring. Like this maybe:
nDPI > 264
300 (so 3.0x)
nDPI > 240
275 (so 2.75x)
nDPI > 216
250 (so 2.5x)
nDPI > 192
225 (so 2.25x)
nDPI > 168
200 (so 2.0
(In reply to Renato S. Yamane from comment #51)
> Just to remember this bug was happening also at 100% scale as you can see on
> the Ckmment below with an screenshot:
>
> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=117158#c4
>
> I cannot test anymore, because I switched back to MS Office.
(In reply to bugzilla2 from comment #47)
> And can you explain that sentence further:
> "The mechanism for "detection" of HiDPI is "thresholded" at 168 dpi."
> I'm not sure what that means.
See the source for CountDPIScaleFactor() [1]. It previously was a single
threshold of >168dpi; and that got
So just need to do it manually when UI is scaled >= 175%, the automated
resampling and rendering of the SVG *remains* inferior to the project's
deployed PNG at the default 100%, i.e. 96dpi resolution.
When and if the project can refactor to more effectively use the SVG
icon sets, the real issue he
(In reply to bugzilla2 from comment #44)
> Ok,time for an update here too :)
> I use SVG-Icons quite a long time now, and for me those always look better
> than the png versions. I just did an comparison, and the png-version really
> looks terrible on an high-dpi monitor with 175% scale.
>
> As fa
(In reply to Yurij Z from comment #68)
> Shift+Click doesn't work as well as a rectangle-drag selection.
Granted, but that was not the OP here. The rectangle-drag has never been
implemented for Writer. Only + multi-selection which has
worked correctly for writer since the 4.3.5 and 4.0 releases.
(In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #70)
> worked correctly for writer since the 4.3.5 and 4.0 releases.
4.3.5 and 4.4.0
https://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=5f447bb0156322c542649809e1f8ec1db2f22e7d
https://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?h=libreoffice-4-3
*** Bug 117487 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/375395
Title:
[Upstream] scrolling only by full line height
Status i
*** Bug 35759 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/375395
Title:
[Upstream] scrolling only by full line height
Status in
*** Bug 95920 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/375395
Title:
[Upstream] scrolling only by full line height
Status in
>From 3.5.0 builds onward, the multi-line input for the Formula Input Bar
(ScInputBarGroup) provides direct editing of a an over height cell
including cursor and page movements (provided by the edit engine) IMHO
resolving bug 34689.
So yes, the Calc sheet rendered to VCL canvas only scrolls by sin
*** Bug 114849 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/375395
Title:
[Upstream] scrolling only by full line height
Status i
(In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #14)
Sorry, unclear
> IIUC more precise/incremental scrolling has been necessary because the
> entire sheet is the extend of the scroll, millions of cells-thousands of
> columns and rows.
>
rather, more precise/incremental scrolling has been impossible be
An incremental scroll (possibly even smooth scrolling) of the active
Calc sheet would come at considerable cost to performance. But if
implemented as a modal toggle it would make for better UX.
Otherwise, from LO 3.5.0 onward (implemented for GSOC 2011) LO Calc
provides multi-line edit of the acti
*** Bug 139452 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1903632
Title:
Touchscreen can't be used to scroll anymore. Instead i
(In reply to dante19031999 from comment #19)
> Your starmath syntax is just wrong. The command = needs valid expressions at
> both sides, newline indicates end of expression, it is not an expression on
> itself.
> a+b_ij = {} newline {} = c+d
Agree. That is how we handle the NEWLINE command. As po
(In reply to Wolfgang Jäger from comment #44)
> (In reply to Regina Henschel from comment #32 of 2016-01-13)
> > It was correct in-between, so it is not the old bug. ...
>
> What version(s) did it correctly? May the quoted statement have been an
> error?
>
See comment 30 and bug 97111, after tha
(In reply to Regina Henschel from comment #2)
> I think it is a deficit in the UI, that spaces in the margin are not shown.
> Word shows all spaces, SoftMaker shows one space in the margin.
So which is wrong, that there is no string wrap to the following line
with a text run of spaces reaching the
(In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #3)
> Wonder what happens with a text run of ?
So checked, and a run of are entered one at a time and will
be wrapped onto vcl canvas. So just the with attribute
for a text run of spaces is not wrapped--but also it is not visualized
to canvas, and we can
So a new string would go into the OS build appropriate XML...
https://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/jvmfwk/distributions/OpenOfficeorg/
I would guess "Private Build" should be innocuous. But, why is Ubuntu
causing itself grief rolling a "Private Build" when the AdoptOpenJDK is
community prov
> @Stephen?
Sorry, s/Stephen/Stephan
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1822839
Title:
LibreOffice doesn't detect JVM because of unexpected java.vendor
property va
No issue with export to SVG filter, issue with SVG import filter.
Workaround would have been using the svgio filter using Insert -> Image
Resolved with bug 32248.
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=dc3eb865bd10e690dbf80f41277b062ac2253572
tdf#32248 SVG: first attempt to supp
OK then, duping it off to bug 92218
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 92218 ***
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1573031
Title:
Most tool bar butto
*** Bug 99177 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1551873
Title:
PDF export corrupts image transparency
Status in Libre
*** Bug 99168 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1551873
Title:
PDF export corrupts image transparency
Status in Libre
*** Bug 99254 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1551873
Title:
PDF export corrupts image transparency
Status in Libre
*** Bug 99168 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1551873
Title:
PDF export corrupts image transparency
Status in Libre
*** Bug 98450 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1551873
Title:
PDF export corrupts image transparency
Status in Libre
Well, it is a valid issue. The "paste special" list is correct as to the
object type that would be pasted--but it is not very intuitive as to
just what the object represents.
Implement a translatable and human "friendly" labeling for each--not
sure if a tooltip might also be possible, but if so th
*** Bug 80362 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/172779
Title:
[Upstream] [hardy] Draw exporting .odg to .eps crops bot
Image types handling transparency seem to be affected with this sd
filter issue.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/172779
Title:
[Upstream] [hardy] Draw exporting .od
On Windows 7 sp1, 64-bit en-US with
Version: 4.5.0.0.alpha0+
Build ID: 629a705c12766c54e14035b55850e36c2167
TinderBox: Win-x86@39, Branch:master, Time: 2014-12-10_07:01:18
Locale: en_US
Verified fixed, margins are honored and images correctly sized, also
checked examples from the duplicate bug
*** Bug 63334 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/172779
Title:
[Upstream] [hardy] Draw exporting .odg to .eps crops bot
Created attachment 110241
test kit ODG drawing with and without margins and exported images
An old filter issue. Still present in LODev 4.5.0.0alpha0+ affecting
Draw export filter for .EPS, .PNG and .GIF, where image filter is mis-
handling the margin details in calculating image size, and the mar
try that with the correct bug id for mab4.3
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1350369
Title:
[Upstream] soffice.bin crashed with SIGSEGV in _SaveBox::CreateNew()
Sta
issue remains with 4.3 and 4.4 builds. Moving to mab4.3
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1350369
Title:
[Upstream] soffice.bin crashed with SIGSEGV in _SaveBox::Crea
Adolfo, Caolán, *
Setting back to NEW. I could be wrong butI don't believe the commit
listed (from bug 84757) is actually against this CUPS authentication
issue--although it was annotated such in gerrit review, removed the
whiteboard notation.
Stuart
--
You received this bug notification becaus
Version detail should be set to the earliest release the issue is
confirmed on, please do not advance it--a note in a comment is all that
is required.
Resetting to original reporting.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome
Peter,
(In reply to comment #17)
The devs just gave this a tweak. Please try the "check for update" from Help
menu.
Let us know how that goes and if Template Editing is in fact fixed for
you.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed
(In reply to comment #18)
s/Pedro,/Peter,
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1277128
Title:
LibreOffice crashes when trying to open template for editing from
Templa
(In reply to comment #18)
One of those days...the 4.2.1.1 release was 14 Feb so
s/ 4.2.1.1 15-Apr-2014/ 4.2.1.114-Feb-2014
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/127
Pedro,
(In reply to comment #17)
> > fdo#74148: sfx2: fix crash when editing template
> >
> > It will be available in LibreOffice 4.2.1.
>
The check for updates function does not work correctly.
Here are dates for the releases for 4.2 thus far, available here:
http://downloadarchive.documentfoun
*** Bug 71358 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1246583
Title:
All hotkeys of LibreOffice don't work in non-English ke
*** Bug 59045 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1246583
Title:
All hotkeys of LibreOffice don't work in non-English ke
(In reply to comment #235)
> About my last post about 51453...it's an annoying bug, but it's listed
> against OpenOffice at the Apache site:
> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=51453
Happens to all of us who follow both projects ;-)
>
> It still applies to LibreOffice. What's the righ
>From OP of bug 60715:
>Problem description: The Recent Documents list removes underscores "_" from
>the >filename and shows the filenames without them. Writer, Impress and Calc
>do this, >so it is probably the same for all.
>
>Operating System: Ubuntu
>Version: 3.6.4.3 release
App
Adjusting summary replacing "sanitizes" with "removes underscore" as
more more precise description of issue--and only because it will help
when searching issues.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https
(In reply to comment #208)
> Bug 61903 - FORMATTING: entering 3/4/13 into a date formatted cell is
> changed to fraction 3/4 and /13
>
> This bug prevents typing in a date as 3/4/13 changes to ¾/13 (three-quarters
> sign then /13 - happens as soon as the second forward slash is entered).
RESOLVED
48 matches
Mail list logo
