Thanks Daniel, just changed to Wayland in chrome, will see if it happens again.
Have a nice day
Steve
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to mutter in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2106656
Title:
Shell crash
Status
Thanks for the suggestion Daniel, unfortunately it hasn't made any
difference. The glitching still occurs
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2106376
Title:
Date & Time
screen
Thanks
Steve
** Attachment added: "journal.zip"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/2106656/+attachment/5870848/+files/journal.zip
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-shell
Thanks, I will try out 25.04!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2106376
Title:
[xe] Top of screen (date & time and notification area) glitches
Status in linux-oem-6.11 pac
Selecting "Do not disturb" shows the glitch included on the disabled
notifications icon
** Attachment added: "20250410_091439.jpg"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/2106376/+attachment/5870725/+files/20250410_091439.jpg
--
You received this bug notification because y
Image of the glitch appearing as wide as the notification window
** Attachment added: "20250410_091528.jpg"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/2106376/+attachment/5870724/+files/20250410_091528.jpg
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desk
Confirmed, xe.enable_psr=0 is present
```
$ cat /proc/cmdline
BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-6.11.0-1018-oem
root=UUID=4e8c053e-ecc7-4171-ae6b-c6e5c1679d23 ro quiet splash xe.enable_psr=0
vt.handoff=7
```
I also added a couple more photos
--
You received this bug notification because you are a memb
weird, possibly unrelated, diagonal triangle the width of my monitor
showing my background image
** Attachment added: "20250410_091321.jpg"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/2106376/+attachment/5870723/+files/20250410_091321.jpg
--
You received this bug notification
I want to say this is unrelated.
First thing to note is that my scale is 100%, on both my laptop monitor
and my external monitor.
In addition, I have noticed the rectangular area of the glitch as
reported in this bug is not restricted to only the clock.
When a notification popup appears, the gli
Public bug reported:
System freeze, and finally (after some minutes) goes back to login screen
It seems happening every time I'm in a meeting in Teams (web version ), I don't
know if it's linked or not...
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.04
Package: xorg 1:7.7+23ubuntu3
ProcVersionSigna
Thanks for the suggestion Daniel, unfortunately it hasn't made any
difference. The glitching still occurs
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2106376
Title:
Date & Time
Public bug reported:
When moving the mouse over the top bar, or clicking near by,
occasionally a glitch appears, as can be seen in the attached video
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.04
Package: xorg 1:7.7+23ubuntu3
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.11.0-1018.18-oem 6.11.11
Uname: Linux 6.1
rintingProblems, none of which fixed
the problem. Everything that the page tells me to check looks OK.
The printer has a built-in scanner, which works in 20.04.
Output from apt-cache (I'm not sure which of these are right or
relevant):
steve@weddell:~$ apt-cache policy cups
cups:
the recommendations at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingPrintingProblems, none of which fixed
the problem. Everything that the page tells me to check looks OK.
The printer has a built-in scanner, which works in 20.04.
Output from apt-cache (I'm not sure which of these are right or
relev
i recently upgraded to 24.04.1 and i think i'm seeing a similar issue...
i am able to play audio to my DAC after connecting through bluetooth using the
gui.
test sound works, VLC works... but i have audirvana installed and when i use
it to
connect to my computer, the DAC doesn't show up as an
> We should be able to get gutenprint back
> on armhf in time for Ubuntu 24.04 LTS,
26.04 :)
> assuming armhf is still around for us then.
It is supposed to be
> I also added a reminder Jira card for
> myself to re-enable 32-bit builds for
> gutenprint once Debian 13
Please take care in that case that the reverse-recommend on the package
all drop their references, so that the package is removed on upgrade on
armhf and that users don't end up with abandoned old versions of
gutenprint on their systems.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a mem
** Description changed:
Reporting against libglib2.0-bin as that package provides gio
Description: Ubuntu 24.10
Release: 24.10
libglib2.0-bin:
Installed: 2.82.1-0ubuntu1
-
- This issue was first noted on a Mint 22 Cinnamon install, and subsequently
reproduced on Ubuntu 2
** Bug watch added: gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib/-/issues #3542
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib/-/issues/3542
** Also affects: glib2.0 (Arch Linux) via
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib/-/issues/3542
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification b
Public bug reported:
Reporting against libglib2.0-bin as that package provides gio
Description:Ubuntu 24.10
Release:24.10
libglib2.0-bin:
Installed: 2.82.1-0ubuntu1
This issue was first noted on a Mint 22 Cinnamon install, and subsequently
reproduced on Ubuntu 24.04.1 and Ubuntu 2
THis was pocket copied to jammy-security on 2024-10-30 after
verification that the dependencies were satisfiable for people without
jammy-updates enabled: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-
drivers-common/1:0.9.6.2~0.22.04.8
Thanks!
--
You received this bug notification because you are
Hello Marco, or anyone else affected,
Accepted gnome-shell into oracular-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-
shell/47.0-2ubuntu3 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
FTR I do currently have /usr/libexec/gvfsd-fuse running as part of the
gvfs-daemon service.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gvfs in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2075247
Title:
gvfs-fused not running on noble,
Same issue, when switching Brave browser to Full Screen (F11). Also if
just Maximizing Brave browser.
Also happens when Maximizing 'kitty' terminal. Gnome-terminal does not
cause these errors.
So it seems to happen with specifically hardware accelerated
applications.
> uname -a
Linux indy 6.8.0-
Note however that gutenprint shipped already in noble on armhf, rebuilt
with 64-bit time_t. We should not introduce a library transition
between noble and oracular, for an ABI transition that happened between
jammy and noble.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desk
** Package changed: pam (Ubuntu) => gnome-shell (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2080821
Title:
Custom caps lock action inconsistent on login screen
Status
> * Add fibocom mbim service to libmbim
It is very unclear here what you mean by 'service'. From this
description I would have expected to see the addition of a systemd
service unit to the package, but there is none. The changelog is
inadequate for an SRU to explain to users what is being done.
A debdiff is attached for jammy, but there is a task still open for the
devel series. What is the status of this in later releases?
** Changed in: libmbim (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subsc
i386 has been enabled by default on amd64 for quite some time.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2077232
Title:
Security update 42.9-0ubuntu2.2 uninstalls GDM
Sta
** Tags added: foundations-todo
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2077232
Title:
Security update 42.9-0ubuntu2.2 uninstalls GDM
Status in gnome-shell package in U
The only thing is, installing updates through the GUI default upgrader
is NOT supposed to accept solutions that require removing packages. So
this really needs to be tracked down and fixed. I don't think there's
anything further to be done in gnome-shell.
** Also affects: gnome-software (Ubuntu)
Ok, sorry for overlooking.
Here's what it should look like:
$ apt policy gnome-shell
gnome-shell:
Installed: (none)
Candidate: 42.9-0ubuntu2.2
Version table:
42.9-0ubuntu2.2 500
500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy-updates/main amd64 Packages
500 http://security.u
** Changed in: gnome-shell (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2077232
Title:
Security update 42.9-0ubuntu2.2 uninstalls
Upgrade: gnome-shell-common:amd64 (42.9-0ubuntu2.1, 42.9-0ubuntu2.2)
Remove: gnome-shell:amd64 (42.9-0ubuntu2.1),
This shows only gnome-shell-common being installed and gnome-shell being
removed. What does `apt policy` show for these two packages?
--
You received this bug notification because
Override component to main
sysprof 47~beta-1 in oracular: universe/devel -> main
1 publication overridden.
Override component to main
libsysprof-capture-4-dev 47~beta-1 in oracular amd64:
universe/libdevel/optional/100% -> main
libsysprof-capture-4-dev 47~beta-1 in oracular arm64:
universe/libdev
This is a straight swap, so no review needed.
Override component to main
mozjs128 128.0-0ubuntu1 in oracular: universe/libs -> main
libmozjs-128-0 128.0-0ubuntu1 in oracular amd64: universe/libs/optional/100% ->
main
libmozjs-128-0 128.0-0ubuntu1 in oracular arm64: universe/libs/optional/100% ->
I'll try to reproduce with a clean profile when I have a moment.
In the meantime, could you tell me what systemd user unit the process is
part of on your system? I don't see anything in the gvfs-fuse package
itself that would start it as part of a user session.
--
You received this bug notificat
Did you rule out the option of early-install'in systemd-resolved during
the upgrade? Then there wouldn't need to be special-casing of
resolv.conf because it wouldn't be "gone"
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to firefox in Ubu
Public bug reported:
gvfs-fuse remains part of the Ubuntu Desktop in 24.04, however, I see in
my session that it is not running and as a result there are no mounts
available. I have Android mobile devices that I expect to be able to
access via fuse.
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.04
P
Hello Simon, or anyone else affected,
Accepted gnome-session into noble-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-
session/46.0-1ubuntu4.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. S
Hello Helga, or anyone else affected,
Accepted apport into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/2.28.1-0ubuntu3
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://wiki
An upload of gnome-software to noble-proposed has been rejected from the
upload queue for the following reason: "not an SRU, should be synced to
oracular".
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu.
https://
An upload of gnome-software to noble-proposed has been rejected from the
upload queue for the following reason: "not an SRU, should be synced to
oracular".
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu.
https://
Hello theofficialgman, or anyone else affected,
Accepted gnome-shell-extension-appindicator into noble-proposed. The
package will build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell-extension-
appindicator/58-1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Pleas
sorry, the template is there but I had loaded this page yesterday and
not refreshed!
** Changed in: gnome-shell-extension-appindicator (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => New
** Changed in: gnome-shell-extension-appindicator (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: New => Fix Committed
** Tags added: ver
Hello iMac, or anyone else affected,
Accepted gnome-shell-extension-appindicator into noble-proposed. The
package will build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell-extension-
appindicator/58-1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us b
Hello theofficialgman, or anyone else affected,
Accepted gnome-shell-extension-appindicator into noble-proposed. The
package will build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell-extension-
appindicator/58-1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Pleas
An upload of gnome-shell-extension-appindicator has been uploaded to
noble for this issue, but this bug lacks an SRU test case.
** Changed in: gnome-shell-extension-appindicator (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
ing when handling the massive Y2028 time_t
transition when upgrading to Ubuntu 24.04 LTS.
It was identified that dropping the libglib2.0-0 transitional package
can help apt do things in the correct order.
Technically, Steve Langasek already removed libglib2.0-0 from noble
release just bef
An upload of xdg-desktop-portal to noble-proposed has been rejected from
the upload queue for the following reason: "merge changelog includes
references to long-fixed bugs, needs cleanup".
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to x
An upload of xdg-desktop-portal to noble-proposed has been rejected from
the upload queue for the following reason: "merge changelog includes
references to long-fixed bugs, needs cleanup".
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to x
Public bug reported:
Currently, desktop-file-utils lists the snap store as the default
handler for Debian packages:
$ grep debian /usr/share/applications/defaults.list
application/vnd.debian.binary-package=snap-store_ubuntu-software-local-file.desktop
application/x-debian-package=snap-store_ubun
** Changed in: webkit2gtk (Ubuntu)
Milestone: ubuntu-24.04 => noble-updates
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to webkit2gtk in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2037015
Title:
Screen corruption of webkit2gtk apps i
recent discussion out-of-band suggested this might have been a rpi-
specific failure, is that accurate?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libcanberra in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060693
Title:
No welcome/lo
This is targeted to 24.04 and marked as 'in progress' but is definitely
not landing before 24.04 GA on Thursday. What is the overall plan here?
should this go to SRU? (It can, but in that case doesn't benefit users
wrt the corruption issue in the *installer* until 24.04.1.)
--
You received this
** Also affects: xorg-server (Ubuntu Noble)
Importance: High
Status: Triaged
** Also affects: xwayland (Ubuntu Noble)
Importance: High
Status: Triaged
** Also affects: xorg-server (Ubuntu Jammy)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: xwayland (Ubuntu Jam
I have prepared test packages for ubuntu 22.04 LTS/jammy in the
https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-security-
proposed/+archive/ubuntu/ppa/+packages PPA for both xorg-server:
https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-security-
proposed/+archive/ubuntu/ppa/+sourcepub/15921802/+listing-archive-extra
and for xwayla
The reproducer https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=28621 from
the original 2009 bug report
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23286 does seem to work at
triggering this issue, at least under Xwalyand.
** Bug watch added: freedesktop.org Bugzilla #23286
https://bugs.freedesk
Are people seeing this issue with any other Ubuntu releases, which also
received updates addressing CVE-2024-31083, or is this strictly
affecting the version in 22.04/jammy?
It looks like
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/xserver/-/merge_requests/1476 has a
proposed fix, in
https://gitlab.freede
** Changed in: c2esp (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to c2esp in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059157
Title:
proposed-migration for cups 2.4.7-1.2ubuntu1
Status in c
** Changed in: c2esp (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to c2esp in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059281
Title:
libcupsfilters 2.0.0-0ubuntu6 results in autopkgtest re
still tagged 'time-t' because it's in the batch of test regressions
we've allowed as part of the time_t migration
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gtk4 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059158
Title:
proposed-m
Since this bug report was filed, there has been a security update of
gst-plugins-good1.0 in jammy which built successfully. Closing invalid.
** Changed in: gst-plugins-good1.0 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Package
c2esp autopkgtest still fails with the current cups in noble-proposed -
though it appears to fail differently now.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to cups in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059157
Title:
proposed-
** Description changed:
- click 0.5.2-2 is stuck in -proposed. autopkgtest now fails on ppc64el,
- s390x.
+ click 0.5.2-2 is stuck in -proposed. autopkgtest now fails on all archs
+ except amd64.
In order to be able to run the tests without all-proposed=1, glib 2.0 is
needed, which is why
** Changed in: ubuntu-unity-backgrounds (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-wallpapers in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056591
Title:
[UIFe] Noble Flavor Wallpa
Public bug reported:
gtk4 4.14.1+ds-0ubuntu1 is stuck in -proposed with test regressions on
armhf.
1706s # Running test: gtk-4.0/tools/settings.test
1706s # FAIL: gtk-4.0/tools/settings.test (Child process exited with code 126)
1706s not ok - gtk-4.0/tools/settings.test
2100s # Running test: gtk
Public bug reported:
multiple cups-related packages are having test failures on armhf after time_t
transition.
https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/c/c2esp/noble/armhf
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups-browsed/2.0.0-0ubuntu9
I am suspecting a common cups-based issue.
cups-browsed alr
marking critical because these packages are being allowed into the
release pocket as-is but the printing stack may be broken, which is of
high importance in a server/embedded context.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to cups i
Thanks! Since this issue was seen only with the package in -proposed,
I'm closing this bug.
There are other unrelated test failures now blocking the build on
armhf. I will open a separate bug for these.
** Changed in: cups-browsed (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
** Change
Public bug reported:
cups-browsed 2.0.0-0ubuntu9 is stuck in -proposed with test failures on
armhf.
** Affects: cups-browsed (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Tags: time-t update-excuse
** Tags added: time-t
** Description changed:
- cups-browsed 2.0.0-0ubuntu9 is s
** Tags removed: update-excuse
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to remmina in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2057842
Title:
FFe: [MIR] freedp2 -> freerdp3 in main
Status in freerdp3 package in Ubuntu:
Fix Releas
Public bug reported:
gnome-remote-desktop 46~rc-0ubuntu2 is built in -proposed but not on
armhf. This will not block migration because armhf binaries are being
removed from the release pocket, but unless addressed will regress armhf
availability of this package in 24.04 LTS.
** Affects: gnome-re
[1724567.629003] audit: type=1400 audit(1711133926.877:813):
apparmor="DENIED" operation="file_mmap" class="file"
namespace="root//lxd-noble-armhf_"
profile="/usr/sbin/cups-browsed" name="/usr/sbin/cups-browsed"
pid=876865 comm="cups-browsed" requested_mask="rm" denied_mask="rm"
fsuid=1000110 ouid=
somehow
ONLY runs as ./debian/cups-browsed/usr/sbin/cups-browsed and segfaults
when invoked as /usr/sbin/cups-browsed.
** Affects: apparmor (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Affects: cups-browsed (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Assignee: Steve Langasek (vorlon
Public bug reported:
cpdb-backend-cups 2.0~b5-0ubuntu5 has a build-time test failure on
armhf.
** Affects: cpdb-backend-cups (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Tags: time-t update-excuse
** Tags added: time-t
** Description changed:
- cpdb-backend-cups 2.0~b5-0ubuntu
mesa bootstrap had not been unwound all the way. Fixed mesa is building
now.
** Package changed: auto-multiple-choice (Ubuntu) => mesa (Ubuntu)
** Changed in: mesa (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
** Changed in: mesa (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Steve Langase
** Package changed: ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu) => ubuntu-raspi-settings
(Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-meta in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2057822
Title:
Removing irqbalance disables power button
The UI Freeze exists to ensure that documentation team and translation
team efforts aren't wasted working on a UI that isn't finalized.
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FreezeExceptionProcess#UserInterfaceFreeze_Exceptions
UIFreeze granted, provided you notify ubuntu-...@lists.ubuntu.com in
advance.
** C
I've sponsored this for noble. For the SRUs, I would like to see a test
case explicitly included that says you will regression-test this on
other bluetooth pairings on other devices: the patch is not a platform-
specific quirk, it is a change to generic bluetooth code, so there
should be explicit
The Firefox issue can be found at:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1882449
The issue has been closed and supposedly fixed. The target milestone has
been set to 125, which I assume means that it should be included in the
Firefox 125 release planned for 16 April 2024. In the meantime, t
Also have this issue (100% cpu usage by /usr/sbin/rsyslogd) with Firefox
in Sway on Ubuntu 22.04. So far I've only noticed this after reloading
the sway config (`swaymsg reload` or Mod+Shift+c).
Fabien (afabien) wrote:
> To avoid having disk full problems, I used the following workaround:
>
> I cr
Belated response, but just for the record, Paride's recounting of upstream's
position in the context of the Debian decision was definitive for me:
On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 11:47:56AM -, Paride Legovini wrote:
> Back in the day I asked upstream their take on irqbalance usefulness
> with newer ke
On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 06:51:46PM -, Philip Roche wrote:
> @vorlon @jchittum @paelzer given the above findings are you still -1 on
> any snap preseeding? Based on the data, I vote not to preseed any snaps.
That is my position. Thanks for bringing data to this!
--
You received this bug noti
> This is a significant difference and for a workload we intend to remain as a
> core tested
> and tracked workload. As such I propose we re-introduce core22 and snapd
> snaps to our seed.
I disagree that the image should be optimized by default to prioritize
the one-time startup performance of
Removing packages from noble:
nvidia-graphics-drivers-515-server 515.105.01-0ubuntu2 in noble
libnvidia-cfg1-510-server 515.105.01-0ubuntu2 in noble amd64
libnvidia-cfg1-510-server 515.105.01-0ubuntu2 in noble arm64
libnvidia-common-510-server
Removing packages from noble:
nvidia-graphics-drivers-460 460.91.03-0ubuntu1 in noble
libnvidia-cfg1-450 460.91.03-0ubuntu1 in noble amd64
libnvidia-cfg1-455 460.91.03-0ubuntu1 in noble amd64
libnvidia-common-450 460.91.03-0ubuntu1 in noble am
All older source packages listed in this bug report have been removed,
and yet:
$ reverse-depends src:nvidia-graphics-drivers-460
Reverse-Depends
===
* libnvidia-decode-455 (for libnvidia-decode-460)
* libnvidia-encode-455 (for libnvidia-encode-460)
* nvidia-headless-
Same for 515-server:
$ reverse-depends src:nvidia-graphics-drivers-515-server
Reverse-Depends
===
* libnvidia-decode-510-server (for libnvidia-decode-515-server)
* libnvidia-encode-510-server (for libnvidia-encode-515-server)
Packages without architectures listed are reverse-depen
Removing packages from noble:
nvidia-graphics-drivers-450 450.119.03-0ubuntu1 in noble
libnvidia-cfg1-440 450.119.03-0ubuntu1 in noble amd64
libnvidia-common-440 450.119.03-0ubuntu1 in noble amd64
libnvidia-common-440 450.119.03-0ubuntu1 in no
** Summary changed:
- Firefox utilizins 100% of station CPU
+ Firefox utilizing 100% of station CPU
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to firefox in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2048792
Title:
Firefox utilizing 10
Additional info:
Firefox is at version 100.0.2
It is installed as a deb package
We're running Ubuntu 20.04
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to firefox in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2048792
Title:
Firefox utiliz
Public bug reported:
At a high level, in certain instances we’re experiencing sustained
abnormally high (100%) CPU utilization from Firefox. This utilization
is competing with other critical application processes on the systems,
starving them of resources, causing issues in the application
proces
Removing packages from noble:
nvidia-graphics-drivers-440 440.100-0ubuntu1 in noble
libnvidia-cfg1-430 440.100-0ubuntu1 in noble amd64
libnvidia-common-430 440.100-0ubuntu1 in noble amd64
libnvidia-common-430 440.100-0ubuntu1 in noble arm64
Hi Christian,
I see a lot of strong opinions being given, but aside from the "don't
use it in KVM" guidance which appears to be based on GCE's engineering
expertise, very little evidence that irqbalance is actually a problem.
I think it's true that in the default config, irqbalance can interfere
Removing packages from noble:
nvidia-graphics-drivers-515 515.105.01-0ubuntu3 in noble
Comment: Unsupported driver version; LP: #2048087
1 package successfully removed.
** Changed in: nvidia-graphics-drivers-515 (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Fix Released
--
You received this bug no
The other packages in this listed are reported by reverse-depends to
have non-empty revdeps. However it looks like these all come from other
packages that have just been removed. Rather than tracing this manually
and possibly making a mistake, I'll let the others sit for another
round.
--
You r
Removing packages from noble:
nvidia-graphics-drivers-510 510.108.03-0ubuntu3 in noble
libnvidia-cfg1-495 510.108.03-0ubuntu3 in noble amd64
libnvidia-common-495 510.108.03-0ubuntu3 in noble amd64
libnvidia-common-495 510.108.03-0ubuntu3 in no
Removing packages from noble:
nvidia-graphics-drivers-530 530.41.03-0ubuntu2 in noble
Comment: Unsupported driver version; LP: #2048087
1 package successfully removed.
** Changed in: nvidia-graphics-drivers-530 (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Fix Released
--
You received this bug not
Removing packages from noble:
nvidia-graphics-drivers-455 455.45.01-0ubuntu1 in noble
libnvidia-cfg1-435 455.45.01-0ubuntu1 in noble amd64
libnvidia-common-435 455.45.01-0ubuntu1 in noble amd64
libnvidia-common-435 455.45.01-0ubuntu1 in noble
1 - 100 of 1027 matches
Mail list logo
