[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1243311] Re: GPU lockup when using 2 video cards

2014-02-26 Thread HyperHacker
I've tried this driver again, and this time it was only able to detect one screen. I'll try with a development version next time I reboot. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-video-ati in Ubuntu. https://bugs.laun

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1243311] Re: GPU lockup when using 2 video cards

2013-10-22 Thread HyperHacker
** Attachment added: "syslog reporting GPU lockup" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-ati/+bug/1243311/+attachment/3887591/+files/gpu-lockup.syslog.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to xserver-

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1243311] Re: GPU lockup when using 2 video cards

2013-10-22 Thread HyperHacker
Further research: when attempting to place the "top" screen in any other position (left, right, or below other displays), it displays the same noise, but the system doesn't hang. Syslog and kern.log are spammed with a new message: Oct 22 13:08:28 guilmon kernel: [ 1105.381816] radeon :02:00.0:

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1243311] Re: GPU lockup when using 2 video cards

2013-10-22 Thread HyperHacker
** Attachment added: "kern.log reporting GPU lockup" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-ati/+bug/1243311/+attachment/3887592/+files/gpu-lockup.kern.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to xserver-

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1243311] Re: GPU lockup when using 2 video cards

2013-10-22 Thread HyperHacker
** Attachment added: "Xorg.0.log of issue" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-ati/+bug/1243311/+attachment/3887593/+files/gpu-lockup.Xorg.0.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-vid

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1243311] [NEW] GPU lockup when using 2 video cards

2013-10-22 Thread HyperHacker
Public bug reported: My system has a Radeon HD 7750 and Radeon HD 6450, together driving 4 displays: Left: VGA on 7750 via DisplayPort adaptor, 1280x1024 Middle: DVI on 7750, 1920x1080 Right: HDMI on 7750, 1680x1050 Top (above Middle): VGA on 6450, 1280x1024 With only Left, Middle and Right enabl

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1184063] Re: With nonrectangular multi-monitor arrangements, display region is wrong

2013-05-26 Thread HyperHacker
Actually, I guess it's not even non-rectangular configurations that cause this issue - after changing them to a wide rectangular configuration, DVI-1 still displays the region from 1280x1024+0+0 (which is now also displayed on the topmost screen), while xrandr still claims it's 1920x1080+2560+0. Th

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1184063] Re: With nonrectangular multi-monitor arrangements, display region is wrong

2013-05-24 Thread HyperHacker
apport information ** Tags added: apport-collected raring ** Description changed: In Lubuntu 13.04, I have an unusual display configuration: three monitors arranged horizontally and a fourth centred above them. This worked fine in 12.04; after upgrading, the middle display is not working

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1184063] Re: With nonrectangular multi-monitor arrangements, display region is wrong

2013-05-24 Thread HyperHacker
I should probably also mention that all four displays are connected to an ATI HD 5700. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-video-ati in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1184063 Title: With nonrectangular

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1184063] [NEW] With nonrectangular multi-monitor arrangements, display region is wrong

2013-05-24 Thread HyperHacker
Public bug reported: In Lubuntu 13.04, I have an unusual display configuration: three monitors arranged horizontally and a fourth centred above them. This worked fine in 12.04; after upgrading, the middle display is not working correctly. xrandr --output DVI-1 --mode 1920x1080 --rate 60

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1074582] Re: Incorrect "minus" icon for text size field

2013-01-06 Thread HyperHacker
Yes, there are several themes you could switch to that would make the bug effectively invisible. Or the author could go change the single line that specifies the "gtk-stock-remove" or whatever icon, and change it to the appropriate icon for "zoom out" or "reduce", and actually fix the issue. -- Y

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1074582] Re: Incorrect "minus" icon for text size field

2013-01-06 Thread HyperHacker
*facepalm* -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gucharmap in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1074582 Title: Incorrect "minus" icon for text size field Status in “gucharmap” package in Ubuntu: Expired Bug descript

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 583797] Re: "Warn on closing with multiple tabs open" not honored

2012-11-17 Thread HyperHacker
Still an issue with 16.0.2. Accidentally hit Ctrl+Q instead of Ctrl+W (and you will), browser just quits without any warning or prompt. Extremely annoying, extremely obvious design issue that should have been fixed over 2 years ago now. At least in recent versions it's possible to restore the sess

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1074582] Re: Incorrect "minus" icon for text size field

2012-11-06 Thread HyperHacker
Yes, this happens with lubuntu's Industrial theme, and any theme that doesn't use a minus sign for the "remove" icon. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gucharmap in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1074582 Title: I

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 789032] Re: power CPU did not OFF when system shutdown

2012-11-02 Thread HyperHacker
This is obviously not the right package, but I'm not sure what is... hopefully somebody sees this and knows what to change it to. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gucharmap in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/789032

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1074582] [NEW] Incorrect "minus" icon for text size field

2012-11-02 Thread HyperHacker
Public bug reported: gucharmap is using the "remove" icon instead of the "minus" icon for the text entry field, which makes no sense in themes where "remove" is not a minus icon, as shown. ** Affects: gucharmap (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Attachment added: "Screen

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 824099] Re: Max GL texture size can break multi-head

2011-11-28 Thread HyperHacker
I should note that the description is somewhat inaccurate: 1) Multi-head isn't really the problem, just the easiest way to reproduce it. A single display with a high enough resolution can trigger it as well. 2) There are two separate limits: max texture size and max framebuffer size. The former c