Public bug reported:
The video is scrambled. It's a mpeg file with these characteristics:
$ file tp224.mpeg
tp224.mpeg: MPEG sequence, v1, progressive Y'CbCr 4:2:0 video, CCIR/ITU NTSC
525, 25 fps
$ apt-cache policy totem
totem:
Installed: 42.0-1ubuntu1
Candidate: 42.0-1ubuntu1
Version ta
Seems possible, but I don't know what might be going on in the
reporter's machine, since that's a setup that works ~everywhere else?
To double-check, can you confirm that
`MOZ_GTK_TITLEBAR_DECORATION=system` works, but
`MOZ_GTK_TITLEBAR_DECORATION=client` doesn't? Also does enabling the
system tit
Created attachment 9279754
Bug 1772693 - Don't transition from fullscreen -> maximized on double-click.
r=stransky
It's probably unexpected (even though after the patch above it behaves
properly).
Depends on D148340
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Pac
Created attachment 9279753
Bug 1772693 - Fix transition from fullscreen to maximized. r=stransky
We don't call MakeFullScreen(false), causing weirdness. This is needed even
with the next patch because otherwise other things like grabbing the tabbar
cause the same kind of weirdness.
--
You recei
Sylvestre, do you know why reviewbot didn't complain about the static
analysis issue in the phab revision? I'm pretty sure it used to do that
in the past.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to firefox in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.lau
How does this compare to the portal service that was recently added for
Flatpak and so on? Do we really need both?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to firefox in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1100326
Title:
Locati
Thanks all!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to firefox in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1959027
Title:
[snap] Various UI and theming issues when running in Plasma Wayland
session
Status in Mozilla Firefox:
U
Does that happen with other GTK apps ran via snap? I don't think we have
control about the GTK theme in use.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to firefox in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1959027
Title:
[snap] Vario
I see. In that case, I think the remaining issues should be reported to
KDE or Canonical (not sure where does the culprit live).
Might be worth starting with canonical since it seems snap-specific, but
on the other hand this seems specific to snap-on-plasma-on-wayland...
Vlad, Olivier, do you have
Does this work on the nightly? I would expect bug 1734934 to have fixed
this.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to firefox in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1959027
Title:
[snap] Various UI and theming issues when r
Bug 1745419 will fix that.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to firefox in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1871644
Title:
Top corners of Firefox windows have weird black protrusions from the
rounded edges
Status i
*** Bug 1721154 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to firefox in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1936647
Title:
right-click popups transparent after upgrade to Firefox 9
(In reply to gschram from comment #47)
> I understand that this is an edge case currently (with the patched mutter)
> but I foresee this becoming a "problem" when in a year or two all other apps
> also have rounded bottom corners and Firefox is the odd one out, I think
> fixing this now is a goo
So, querying the individual border-radius properties doesn't work. I
get:
> (firefox:17330): Gtk-WARNING **: 00:39:54.651: Style property "border-
top-left-radius" is not gettable
And same for the other corners of course. However, my patch works,
because of [this
code](https://gitlab.gnome.org/GN
Well, perhaps, but that seems tangential to this bug, isn't it? We don't
use XShapeCombineMask for the titlebar and this patch stack doesn't
start doing that.
If we do want to do the cleanup described above, we might need a new
media query which determines this (but it should definitely not have
`
Yeah, so `nsWindow::GetTitlebarRadius` can be called off the main thread
which seems unfortunate. We can fix this easily by moving the titlebar
radius to a member or such.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to firefox in Ubuntu.
Oh, great, let me know if I can help. Probably a static atomic integer
in nsLookAndFeelGtk is slightly easier to invalidate in practice.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to firefox in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/18
I fixed the wayland overdraw and the X11 artifacts, so I think this is
ready to go. I've tested this stack on KWin and GNOME, both X11 and
Wayland. Will test i3 and such asap.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to firefox in Ubu
(In reply to Darkspirit from comment #19)
> KDE with disabled compositor, i3, etc. use alpha visual, but it's not
> transparent.
WDYM, just that the background wouldn't be transparent?
> Could -moz-gtk-csd-transparent-background be defined with
> gdk_screen_is_composited()
> and be used to forb
Created attachment 9246314
Bug 1509931 - Use a more precise toolbar radius. r=stransky
This seemed possible/maybe worth doing, but let me know if you'd rather
keep the 10 hard-coded.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to firef
Ah, I think I know why that might be...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to firefox in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1871644
Title:
Top corners of Firefox windows have weird black protrusions from the
rounded ed
Created attachment 9246291
Bug 1509931 - Simplify titlebar buttons CSS. r=stransky
There's no need to use the media query to set the default styles of the
buttons, we only need to hide them if appropriate.
Depends on D128682
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Des
Created attachment 9246288
Bug 1509931 - Expose titlebar radius as a chrome-only CSS environment variable.
r=stransky
Mostly plumbing.
Depends on D128679
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to firefox in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.
Created attachment 9246290
Bug 1509931 - Remove -moz-gtk-csd-transparent-background. r=stransky
We always use alpha visual for WebRender, and appearance: none is
unnecessary (root element has no intrinsic appearance).
Depends on D128681
--
You received this bug notification because you are a m
(In reply to Martin Stránský [:stransky] (ni? me) from comment #11)
> Emilio, how is the best way how to do it? We can introduce a new appearance
> (-moz-window-titlebar-alpha for instance) which contains only alpha component
> from titlebar and paint it over theme color or use exi
Created attachment 9246289
Bug 1509931 - Use titlebar radius on Linux and make titlebar set-up work for
lightweight themes. r=stransky!,dao!
Depends on D128680
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to firefox in Ubuntu.
https://
Created attachment 9246287
Bug 1509931 - Add support for chrome-only environment variables. r=stransky
This bit is taken straight from D73454 (I reviewed it but I guess
another pair of eyes is ok, it's really straight-forward).
Co-authored-by: Nicklas Boman
--
You received this bug notificati
I'm not quite familiar with how this works, I think Martin is the right
person to ask about it.
I can dig if you want but I'd guess that this kind of stuff (the
`:not(:-moz-lwtheme)` bits and such) is related:
https://searchfox.org/mozilla-
central/rev/9bc5dcea99c59dc18eae0de7064131aa20cfbb66/brow
Maybe even tier 2 / running on m-c only, or something?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to firefox in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1850529
Title:
Crash after update to 71.0~b5+build1-0ubuntu0.16.04.1
Status in M
Someone on #introduction mentioned that
https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D56873 did fix the problem for
them.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to firefox in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1850529
Title:
Cra
(In reply to Nathan Froyd [:froydnj] from comment #19)
> (In reply to Mike Hommey [:glandium] (high latency) from comment #18)
> > It's very possible this is the same as bug 1601707. If it is, we don't need
> > to exclude clang 6.
>
> OTOH, I don't want to be rediscovering that people are using a
(In reply to Mike Hommey [:glandium] (high latency) from comment #24)
> That specific comment explicitly says current GCC doesn't implement it. Are
> we going to require clang only now?
Well GCC just fixed it in fairness:
https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc?view=revision&revision=279069
I think they
Ah, thanks for the update Olivier :)
I think it'd still be nice to detect this at configure time if possible,
but it may be not worth the churn.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to firefox in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.ne
Can we add a configure check for this somehow? It seems ubuntu almost
ships a build with this bug, see bug 1600467... :/
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to firefox in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1850529
Title:
*** Bug 1600467 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to firefox in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1850529
Title:
Crash after update to 71.0~b5+build1-0ubuntu0.16.04.1
St
Public bug reported:
Server reboot after multiple errors in dmesg:
[80484.782020] [ cut here ]
[80484.782043] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at
/build/linux-KM2a5S/linux-4.13.0/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:2826
tcp_fastretrans_alert+0x7d0/0x990
[80484.782045] Modules linked in: ufs qnx4
Same problem:
root@lancelot:~# dpkg -l | awk '{print $2" "$3" "$4}' | grep evolution
evolution 3.26.1-1 amd64
evolution-common 3.26.1-1 all
evolution-data-server 3.26.1-1ubuntu1 amd64
evolution-data-server-common 3.26.1-1ubuntu1 all
evolution-data-server-online-accounts 3.26.1-1ubuntu1 all
evoluti
** Information type changed from Private to Public
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gvfs in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1563360
Title:
gvfsd-smb-browse crashed with SIGABRT
Status in gvfs package in Ubuntu:
Hi Seth, I certainly have this bug in 15.10 yet.
Using any other key for keyboard layout switch work, but not
super+space.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-settings-daemon in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1
I should mention that I'm using gnome-session-fallback
** Changed in: unity (Ubuntu)
Status: Invalid => New
** Changed in: unity
Status: Invalid => New
** Changed in: gnome-settings-daemon (Ubuntu)
Status: Expired => New
--
You received this bug notification because you ar
Public bug reported:
Rhythmbox no reproduce sonido de música seleccionado. Cuando intento
reproducir sonido, solicita descargar actualizaciones, pero al intentar
actualizar, avisa un mensaje de que no se puede descargar complemento.
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04
Package: libgstream
Public bug reported:
When I select a music file or a video file, no sound comes from the
speakers, although when I checked the speakers, it worked fine.
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04
Package: alsa-base 1.0.25+dfsg-0ubuntu4
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.13.0-37.64-generic 3.13.11.7
I notice the same bug (it is not deterministic, in my case I can use rdesktop,
but it crashes serveral times in a day while using rdesktop client).
in my case bug still persists using intel drivers from
https://01.org/linuxgraphics/downloads/2014/intelr-graphics-installer-1.0.6-linux
--
You rec
Hello! I'm very new to this (or any) forum but I'd always wanted to
participate/collaborate since I first installed Kubuntu back in 2008.
I have an Asus N56VB and I have the very problems described here, but I can
add something more: using the steps described in #34 in
https://bugs.launchpad.ne
Public bug reported:
System often freezes. This happens since many Ubuntu versions and many
Nvidia releases. With fresh installs too.
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.04
Package: xorg 1:7.7+1ubuntu4
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.8.0-31.46-generic 3.8.13.8
Uname: Linux 3.8.0-31-generic x
Looks like Impress has regressed, see bug #67529.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/628105
Title:
[Upstream] Text not black in LibreOffice
Status in LibreOffice Prod
Nevermind the above comment.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/628105
Title:
[Upstream] Text not black in LibreOffice
Status in LibreOffice Productivity Suite:
Fix
In Firefox 17 the setting browser.tabs.loadDivertedInBackground works no
more.
Really annoying!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to ubufox in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272171
Title:
Firefox should not steal f
/dev/snd/controlC1: emilio 2076 F pulseaudio
/dev/snd/controlC0: emilio 2076 F pulseaudio
emilio 4240 f mate-volume-con
Card0.Amixer.info:
Card hw:0 'SB'/'HDA ATI SB at 0xf240 irq 16'
Mixer name : 'IDT 92HD75B3X
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gtk+2.0 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/926898
Title:
package libgail-common 2.24.1-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade:
ErrorMessage: dependency problems - leaving unconfigure
Public bug reported:
problems upgrading ubuntu version.
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04
Package: libgail-common 2.24.1-1ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-25.44-generic 2.6.35.10
Uname: Linux 2.6.35-25-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
Architecture: amd64
Date:
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to evolution in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/885911
Title:
evolution shows no mail sent
Status in “evolution” package in Ubuntu:
New
Bug description:
Evolution 3.2.0
Ubuntu
Public bug reported:
Evolution 3.2.0
Ubuntu 11.10
i386
center software upgraded from Ubuntu
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10
Package: evolution 3.2.0-0ubuntu2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.0.0-12.20-generic 3.0.4
Uname: Linux 3.0.0-12-generic i686
ApportVersion: 1.23-0ubuntu3
Archite
** Attachment added: "Pantallazo del 2011-10-31 22:17:59.png"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-center/+bug/884589/+attachment/2581218/+files/Pantallazo%20del%202011-10-31%2022%3A17%3A59.png
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, w
** Attachment added: "Pantallazo del 2011-10-31 22:17:46.png"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-center/+bug/884589/+attachment/2581217/+files/Pantallazo%20del%202011-10-31%2022%3A17%3A46.png
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, w
55 matches
Mail list logo
