(In reply to Ian Neal from comment #23)
> (In reply to Alex Keybl [:akeybl] from comment #19)
> > (In reply to Ian Neal from comment #18)
> > > I don't believe anything landed in time for FF18, so FF18 had the 404, at
> > > the moment FF19 will have no Chambers se
(In reply to Ian Neal from comment #18)
> I don't believe anything landed in time for FF18, so FF18 had the 404, at
> the moment FF19 will have no Chambers search plugin.
No need to track in that case. Thanks for the context.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desk
If this is left unfixed for FF19 release, we'll be in the same position
as FF18 release correct?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to firefox in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1096286
Title:
Firefox Search Engine is
(In reply to Chris Coulson from comment #12)
> Note, this actually only affects builds that are built with --enable-gio, so
> it doesn't affect mozilla.org builds. It only affects Linux distributions
> who are building with gio support and running on GNOME 3, and we're carrying
> this as a distro p
Including Mark to see if we've gotten any feedback that would push us to
uplift this fix to Beta 12.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to thunderbird in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/939657
Title:
Generates a dbus
Tracking for Firefox 11 and 12 since this is a regression in 11. Based
upon the perf symptoms detailed here and the lack of dupes, we likely
will not want to uplift this fix to Beta prior to release based upon the
risk/reward. Please send email to release-m...@mozilla.com if you
disagree. We'd be w
Comment on attachment 599958
Android-specific patch for aurora and beta
[Triage Comment]
Android-specific change that prevents a website regression in Native Fennec
caused by recent UA changes. Approving for Aurora 12 and Beta 11.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member o
Comment on attachment 581750
Updated patch.
[Triage Comment]
Given the lack of a viable workaround in the FF11 timeframe, let's uplift to
Aurora 11.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to firefox in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchp
(In reply to alexander :surkov from comment #60)
> Comment on attachment 581750
> Updated patch.
>
> serious regression, low risk, running on trunk for several days, no known
> regression from this patch. rerequest aurora approval.
Is there any alternative for distros to work around this issue?
Comment on attachment 581750
Updated patch.
[Triage Comment]
When evaluating the risk (perf regressions) vs reward (fixing an issue
affecting accessibility users on GNOME 3), we've decided to instead release
note for FF10/11.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of De
Bug 696020 appears to have exacerbated this problem in 10 (see bug
702064). The attached patch appears to be higher risk than we're
comfortable for Beta (please correct me if I'm wrong), but I'm wondering
if this is a good candidate for Aurora 11.
--
You received this bug notification because you
Please nominate for Beta 10 approval if this fix is considered low risk.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to firefox in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/901838
Title:
Ugly busy cursor in Thunderbird 9
Status in The
12 matches
Mail list logo
