Re: patch for gfortran

2011-07-01 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Ben" == Ben Elliston writes: Ben> If we did a release, would this allow the GCC testsuite to rip out Ben> the equivalent code from the testsuite/lib directory? If you mean gdb -- not immediately, I think we usually wait a while so that developers don't always have to use the absolute late

Re: patch for gfortran

2011-06-30 Thread Ben Elliston
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 08:31:46AM +0200, Honza Horak wrote: > Thank you for adding support of f90. Is there any timeframe for a > new release with this support? Not at this stage -- we have done a release only recently. If we did a release, would this allow the GCC testsuite to rip out the equi

Re: patch for gfortran

2011-06-29 Thread Honza Horak
On 06/30/2011 03:28 AM, Tom Tromey wrote: Ben> The .texi file_is_ maintained. It is generated from the Docbook when Ben> you build with --enable-maintainer-mode. There are a few different Ben> db2-foo converters and most of them don't work. What I have installed Ben> works, which is why I

Re: patch for gfortran

2011-06-29 Thread Tom Tromey
Ben> The .texi file _is_ maintained. It is generated from the Docbook when Ben> you build with --enable-maintainer-mode. There are a few different Ben> db2-foo converters and most of them don't work. What I have installed Ben> works, which is why I offered to take care of it. :-) Excellent, tha

Re: patch for gfortran

2011-06-29 Thread Ben Elliston
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 07:56:37AM -0600, Tom Tromey wrote: > I guess the .texi file is not maintained? That is too bad; I > generally prefer info format for online docs, since I live in Emacs. > I tried running the XML through db2x_texixml (yum install > docbook2X), but it gives tons of errors.

Re: patch for gfortran

2011-06-29 Thread Tom Tromey
Ben> doc/ref.xml. Just do your best and I'll make sure it builds with all Ben> of the requisite Docbook tools. I just cut-and-pasted the f77 stuff. There doesn't seem to be any actual text there... I'm not sure where it could go, as I don't know Docbook. I guess the .texi file is not maintained

Re: patch for gfortran

2011-06-29 Thread Ben Elliston
Thanks, Tom. On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 12:55:44PM -0600, Tom Tromey wrote: > I wasn't sure which doc file I should update, so I didn't. Let me > know and I will correct it. doc/ref.xml. Just do your best and I'll make sure it builds with all of the requisite Docbook tools. Cheers, Ben signatu

patch for gfortran

2011-06-28 Thread Tom Tromey
Right now dejagnu supports g77 for compiling Fortran. This is rather old -- last shipped in GCC 3.4, I believe. This patch adds F90 support. I wasn't sure which doc file I should update, so I didn't. Let me know and I will correct it. Tom diff --git a/ChangeLog b/ChangeLog index 92ea733..3cb764