Dave Korn wrote:
On 13 February 2008 19:44, Joel Sherrill wrote:
Dave Korn wrote:
On 13 February 2008 16:05, Joel Sherrill wrote:
What's the proper way to handle a target I don't have
a simulator or target hardware for? Is there a standard
way to just go through the build
On 13 February 2008 19:44, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> Dave Korn wrote:
>> On 13 February 2008 16:05, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>>> What's the proper way to handle a target I don't have
>>> a simulator or target hardware for? Is there a standard
>>> way to just go through the build sequence, not even
>>>
Dave Korn wrote:
On 13 February 2008 16:05, Joel Sherrill wrote:
On to the next matter. I can only run tests automatically
for a handful of the RTEMS targets. I am working to
expand that set but it is always going to be an issue.
What's the proper way to handle a target I don't have
a sim
On 13 February 2008 16:05, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> On to the next matter. I can only run tests automatically
> for a handful of the RTEMS targets. I am working to
> expand that set but it is always going to be an issue.
>
> What's the proper way to handle a target I don't have
> a simulator or t
Hi,
Thanks again for all the help. I posted some results
this morning and you guys deserve a big thank you.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-02/msg00868.html
I am in the middle of a run on sparc-rtems4.9 for sis.
On to the next matter. I can only run tests automatically
for a handf
