Re: patch to allow file name argument to --xml

2012-06-12 Thread Ben Elliston
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 11:43:11AM -0600, Tom Tromey wrote: > Here's an updated patch that also touches the man page. Thanks, applied. Ben signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ DejaGnu mailing list DejaGnu@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mai

Re: patch to allow file name argument to --xml

2012-06-11 Thread Ben Elliston
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 11:43:11AM -0600, Tom Tromey wrote: > Here's an updated patch that also touches the man page. That's fine, thanks, Tom. Cheers, Ben signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ DejaGnu mailing list DejaGnu@gnu.org https://

Re: patch to allow file name argument to --xml

2012-06-11 Thread Rob Savoye
On 06/11/12 11:43, Tom Tromey wrote: > I would have, but --xml already isn't documented, and I don't feel that > I know enough about exactly what it does to document it very well. I added the XML output option solely to make it possible to suck all the testing results into an SQL database. I fo

Re: patch to allow file name argument to --xml

2012-06-11 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Ben" == Ben Elliston writes: Ben> You forgot to update the documentation. :-) I would have, but --xml already isn't documented, and I don't feel that I know enough about exactly what it does to document it very well. Here's an updated patch that also touches the man page. I suppose I can

Re: patch to allow file name argument to --xml

2012-06-08 Thread Ben Elliston
Hi Tom > The --xml option hard-codes the output file name as $tool.xml. > Unfortunately, gdb already has a directory named gdb.xml in its test suite. > So, I wrote this patch to let runtest --xml take an optional file name. You forgot to update the documentation. :-) If you want to just add the