> Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 14:20:38 -0600
> From: Joel Sherrill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> > but
> > if so, it seems simplest to fake a simulator as:
> > set_board_info sim false
> >
> >
> I'll try that next.
In case it wasn't clear: don't forget to use that in a generic
Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 10:59:17 -0600
From: Joel Sherrill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
OK. I will add it to the GCC Projects page.
Would this go into the Bug Patrol section of the
Beginner Projects section?
By the name of it, it sounds like it.
I know they
> From: "Dave Korn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 17:50:42 -
> On 13 February 2008 16:36, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> As a datapoint, the standard per-thread stack allocation on win32 platforms
> is 2MB. That might make a more reasonable cutoff point, because in what's
> prob
> Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 10:59:17 -0600
> From: Joel Sherrill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> OK. I will add it to the GCC Projects page.
> Would this go into the Bug Patrol section of the
> Beginner Projects section?
By the name of it, it sounds like it.
I'm not sure a non-executable setup would make mu
On 13 February 2008 16:36, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
>> Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 10:12:45 -0600
>> From: Joel Sherrill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>> Would it make sense in the future as a (beginner?)
>> GCC project to let me generate a set of GCC testresults
>> and let someone see which tests have issue
Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 10:12:45 -0600
From: Joel Sherrill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Would it make sense in the future as a (beginner?)
GCC project to let me generate a set of GCC testresults
and let someone see which tests have issues honoring
the stack size.
(Run
> Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 10:12:45 -0600
> From: Joel Sherrill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Would it make sense in the future as a (beginner?)
> GCC project to let me generate a set of GCC testresults
> and let someone see which tests have issues honoring
> the stack size.
>
> (Run 1) Run with a small 2-
Joel Sherrill wrote:
Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 15:47:14 -0600
From: Joel Sherrill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I investigated one failure: pr20621-1.x3
You mean gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr20621-1.c at -O3?
From the looks of it, it would take abo
Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 15:47:14 -0600
From: Joel Sherrill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I investigated one failure: pr20621-1.x3
You mean gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr20621-1.c at -O3?
From the looks of it, it would take about 2*0x4000*4 bytes stack.
> Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 15:47:14 -0600
> From: Joel Sherrill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I investigated one failure: pr20621-1.x3
You mean gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr20621-1.c at -O3?
>From the looks of it, it would take about 2*0x4000*4 bytes stack.
> and discovered that it is using a LOT
10 matches
Mail list logo
