>That's ok too. I just thought it would be good to have a target
> to build them.
Sure--I'll make that change.
Ben
pgpNCjCWhRdKi.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
DejaGnu mailing list
DejaGnu@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/dejagnu
Ben Elliston wrote:
We could do that. Why not just call the target `examples', though?
That's ok too. I just thought it would be good to have a target to
build them.
- rob -
___
DejaGnu mailing list
DejaGnu@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.or
> > This patch substantially flattens the tree of Makefile.am's we have.
> > All of the testsuite Makefile.ams have now been collected in the
> > top-level Makefile.am.
>
> Well, considering the lower level Makefiles don't really do much,
> this isn't much of a change anyway.
The change, as I see
Ben Elliston wrote:
This patch substantially flattens the tree of Makefile.am's we have.
All of the testsuite Makefile.ams have now been collected in the
top-level Makefile.am.
Well, considering the lower level Makefiles don't really do much,
this isn't much of a change anyway.
into the
This patch substantially flattens the tree of Makefile.am's we have.
All of the testsuite Makefile.ams have now been collected in the
top-level Makefile.am.
In addition, I changed the configury so that the examples are still
configured, but not built. All that is needed is for the user to cd
into
