Re: Multiple dg-do do not work.

2016-03-12 Thread Ben Elliston
Hi Dominik This patch looks OK -- thanks! Cheers, Ben signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ DejaGnu mailing list DejaGnu@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/dejagnu

Re: Multiple dg-do do not work.

2016-03-09 Thread Dominik Vogt
On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 11:18:28AM +1100, Ben Elliston wrote: > On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 02:29:10PM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote: > > > However, multiple dg-do don't seem to work: > > > > dg-do run { condition } > > dg-do assemble { ! condition } > > There are plenty of examples of this in the t

Re: Multiple dg-do do not work.

2016-03-09 Thread Dominik Vogt
On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 11:18:28AM +1100, Ben Elliston wrote: > On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 02:29:10PM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote: > > > However, multiple dg-do don't seem to work: > > > > dg-do run { condition } > > dg-do assemble { ! condition } > > There are plenty of examples of this in the t

Re: Multiple dg-do do not work.

2016-03-08 Thread Ben Elliston
On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 02:29:10PM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote: > However, multiple dg-do don't seem to work: > > dg-do run { condition } > dg-do assemble { ! condition } There are plenty of examples of this in the testsuite. You may wish to investigate further: $ grep -r dg-do . | awk -F:

Multiple dg-do do not work.

2016-03-08 Thread Dominik Vogt
There is this comment in dg.exp: # Record what to do (compile/run/etc.) # # Multiple instances are supported (since we don't support target and xfail # selectors on one line), though it doesn't make much sense to change the # compile/assemble/link/run field. Nor does it make any sense t