On 12 February 2008 20:04, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> So ... how does this look? YEAH!
w00t! :)
> === gcc Summary ===
>
> # of expected passes44149
> # of unexpected failures396
> # of unresolved testcases 94
> # of untested testcases 35
> # of
Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
From: "Dave Korn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 16:05:18 -
On 12 February 2008 15:48, Joel Sherrill wrote:
I am getting arguments through now. I am on Fedora 8
and the DejaGNU RPM doesn't seem to support ~/.dejagnurc.
No, it mu
On 12 February 2008 19:15, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
>> From: "Dave Korn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 18:52:27 -
>
>> On 12 February 2008 18:19, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> Dave wrote:
# The simulator isn't really remote.
set_board_info isremote 0
> From: "Dave Korn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 18:52:27 -
> On 12 February 2008 18:19, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
Dave wrote:
> >> # The simulator isn't really remote.
> >> set_board_info isremote 0
> >>
> >> I think you'll need that as well.
> >
> > Why?
>
> Becau
On 12 February 2008 17:16, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> Thanks. That sped things up enormously and gets us to this
> critical line of debug output:
>
> spawning command powerpc-rtems4.9-run
> /home/joel/work-gnat/svn/b-gcc2-powerpc/gcc/testsuite/gcc/20010106-1.x0
>
> Clearly, this isn't running my w
On 12 February 2008 18:19, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> What does the "--all" mean? I can't see it being used anywhere;
> neither runtest, runtest.exp nor the gcc ${tool}_option_proc's.
I don't know how it gets used, but the effect is to output a summary line
for all tests, PASSes as well as FA
> From: "Dave Korn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 16:05:18 -
> On 12 February 2008 15:48, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> > I am getting arguments through now. I am on Fedora 8
> > and the DejaGNU RPM doesn't seem to support ~/.dejagnurc.
No, it must be for some other reason. It does
Thanks. That sped things up enormously and gets us to this
critical line of debug output:
spawning command powerpc-rtems4.9-run
/home/joel/work-gnat/svn/b-gcc2-powerpc/gcc/testsuite/gcc/20010106-1.x0
Clearly, this isn't running my wrapper script. :(
I looked in basic-sim.exp and it allows y
On 12 February 2008 16:35, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> I think so. I actually got an executable which
> I could run but DejaGNU didn't know how to.
> So that's half the battle. ;)
>
> ===
> PASS: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/memset-chk.c compilation, -O3
> -fomit-frame-
Dave Korn wrote:
On 12 February 2008 15:48, Joel Sherrill wrote:
From the log I see this which would seem to indicate that I am
not getting any compiler flags passed in.
BTW, although you've already fixed this: I wouldn't expect to see any of the
RUNTESTFLAGS you pass on the comm
On 12 February 2008 15:48, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>> From the log I see this which would seem to indicate that I am
>> not getting any compiler flags passed in.
BTW, although you've already fixed this: I wouldn't expect to see any of the
RUNTESTFLAGS you pass on the commandline ending up in the
Joel Sherrill wrote:
Dave Korn wrote:
On 11 February 2008 21:29, Joel Sherrill wrote:
We use versioned target names. Do I have to list them all in
the following section?
=
# This is a list of toolchains that are supported on this board.
set_board_
Dave Korn wrote:
On 11 February 2008 21:29, Joel Sherrill wrote:
We use versioned target names. Do I have to list them all in
the following section?
=
# This is a list of toolchains that are supported on this board.
set_board_info target_install {powerpc
Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 11:26:41 -0600
From: Joel Sherrill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
RTEMS applications do not return the exit status
to the environment. So it will have to print
pass/fail based on the exit value. I vaguely
remember this not being a big deal for Dej
> Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 11:26:41 -0600
> From: Joel Sherrill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> RTEMS applications do not return the exit status
> to the environment. So it will have to print
> pass/fail based on the exit value. I vaguely
> remember this not being a big deal for DejaGNU.
As Dave mentioned,
On 11 February 2008 21:29, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> We use versioned target names. Do I have to list them all in
> the following section?
>
> =
> # This is a list of toolchains that are supported on this board.
> set_board_info target_install {powerpc-rtems4.9}
Dave Korn wrote:
On 11 February 2008 17:27, Joel Sherrill wrote:
Starting with what I know. This is for the SPARC/SIS
BSP for RTEMS.
To compile:
sparc-rtems4.9-gcc -B${RTEMSBSP_prefix} \
-specs bsp_specs -qrtems -g -O2 -mcpu=cypress \
-c FILE.c
To Link:
sparc-rtems4.9-gcc -B${RTEMSB
On 11 February 2008 17:27, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> Starting with what I know. This is for the SPARC/SIS
> BSP for RTEMS.
>
> To compile:
> sparc-rtems4.9-gcc -B${RTEMSBSP_prefix} \
>-specs bsp_specs -qrtems -g -O2 -mcpu=cypress \
>-c FILE.c
>
> To Link:
> sparc-rtems4.9-gcc -B${RTEMSBSP_
Hi,
I asked on the gcc list but I hope someone here
can help me out. I really do want to be able to
post gcc test results for RTEMS targets.
Starting with what I know. This is for the SPARC/SIS
BSP for RTEMS.
To compile:
sparc-rtems4.9-gcc -B${RTEMSBSP_prefix} \
-specs bsp_specs -qrtems -g
19 matches
Mail list logo
