On 03/25/2013 10:26 PM, Ben Elliston wrote:
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 01:04:59PM +0100, Honza Horak wrote:
Yes, newer config.guess and probably also config.sub should be
enough to fix it.
Wow, the versions in the DejaGnu tree are over a year old. I've just
updated them.
Great, thanks.
Honza
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 01:04:59PM +0100, Honza Horak wrote:
> Yes, newer config.guess and probably also config.sub should be
> enough to fix it.
Wow, the versions in the DejaGnu tree are over a year old. I've just
updated them.
Cheers, Ben
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
On 03/25/2013 12:59 PM, Ben Elliston wrote:
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 12:49:57PM +0100, Honza Horak wrote:
the current dejagnu sources ship autoconf files generated using
autoconf 2.68. Newer version of autoconf 2.69 includes arm64
(aarch64) support, which enables building dejagnu on this platfor
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 12:49:57PM +0100, Honza Horak wrote:
> the current dejagnu sources ship autoconf files generated using
> autoconf 2.68. Newer version of autoconf 2.69 includes arm64
> (aarch64) support, which enables building dejagnu on this platform.
Can you explain why a configure scrip
Hi guys,
the current dejagnu sources ship autoconf files generated using autoconf
2.68. Newer version of autoconf 2.69 includes arm64 (aarch64) support,
which enables building dejagnu on this platform.
Could you, please, migrate dejagnu to 2.69 to be able to build it on arm64?
Regards,
Honza