On May 6, 2005, at 11:14 AM, Josh Conner wrote:
On May 6, 2005, at 10:41 AM, Rob Savoye wrote:
Josh Conner wrote:
Adding support for the program_transform_name (sed-style
expression to convert the names of executables under test) would
simplify the testing of gcc cross-compilers, sinc
On May 6, 2005, at 10:41 AM, Rob Savoye wrote:
Josh Conner wrote:
Adding support for the program_transform_name (sed-style expression
to convert the names of executables under test) would simplify the
testing of gcc cross-compilers, since the runtest.exp procedure
"transform" is unable to find b
Josh Conner wrote:
Adding support for the program_transform_name (sed-style expression to
convert the names of executables under test) would simplify the testing
of gcc cross-compilers, since the runtest.exp procedure "transform" is
unable to find binaries created with a transformed name.
I'd
All -
Adding support for the program_transform_name (sed-style expression to
convert the names of executables under test) would simplify the testing
of gcc cross-compilers, since the runtest.exp procedure "transform" is
unable to find binaries created with a transformed name.
For example, if my
