On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 12:19:14PM +, Matthew Fortune wrote:
> Please can you revert ef5f4a8c and I'll follow up with fixes if
> there are any further problems to solve.
Done! Thanks,
Ben
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
DejaGnu m
Hi Ben,
+ if [info exists GCC_UNDER_TEST] then {
+set compiler $GCC_UNDER_TEST
+ } else {
This is the wrong approach for finding the compiler to use
for the baseboard setup. There is an existing alternative.
We already have the fragment below which means that the
'compiler' part of the boa
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 10:39:54AM -0700, Steve Ellcey wrote:
> 2014-04-14 Steve Ellcey
>
> * baseboards/multi-sim.exp (dynamic_linker_flag): Check GCC_UNDER_TEST.
> * baseboards/multi-sim.exp (rpath_flags): Ditto.
Applied, thanks, Steve. I'm glad I waited two years to review th
This is a proposed change to the multi-sim.exp baseboard to make it more
useful when testing installed cross compilers. I wanted to use the
contrib/test_installed script that comes with GCC to test an installed
cross compiler using a simulator but ran into two problems. The first
was that test_in
