On 12/11/18 7:59 PM, Jacob Bachmeyer wrote:
> Is there a known reason that this approach (an interactive Expect
> subprocess) is not used, or was there simply not time to pursue it in
> early 1996?
In 1996, when that file was written, nobody was using the unit test
API at all. Later on, that d
While recently improving the DejaGnu testsuite, I found that using
"pass" in a unit test case that loads framework.exp produced an error:
"PASS doesn't exist in incr_count". The immediate solution was "well,
of course that does not work" and just writing {puts "PASSED: ..."}
instead, but libs
Pedro Alves wrote:
On 12/10/2018 10:30 PM, Jacob Bachmeyer wrote:
Should DejaGnu eventually support GDB's MI mode, possibly in another module?
Would this be for GDB's own testing, or for something else?
The intent was (future) use of GDB as a tool within DejaGnu as part of
tests
On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 03:25:06PM +, Pedro Alves wrote:
> Would this be for GDB's own testing, or for something else?
No, for controlling GDB from DejaGnu. Consider a version of
gdb_comm_delete_breakpoints that interacts with the controlled GDB
process using MI instead of matching string out
On 12/10/18 11:00 PM, Jacob Bachmeyer wrote:
> That is on my local TODO list, after quite a bit of other code and
> documentation work, including sorting out "which of these procedures
> should be in an exported API and which should be considered internal?"
> That it is mentioned at all suggests
On 12/10/2018 10:30 PM, Jacob Bachmeyer wrote:
> Should DejaGnu eventually support GDB's MI mode, possibly in another module?
Would this be for GDB's own testing, or for something else?
GDB already has MI testcases driven by dejagnu. Most live under
gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/
https://sourceware.or
On 12/11/18 2:55 AM, Ben Elliston wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 04:30:49PM -0600, Jacob Bachmeyer wrote:
>
>> GDB has changed somewhat over the years; are the strings those
>> modules seek still valid or do we need to accept both "old" and
>> "new" message sets? Should DejaGnu eventually suppo
On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 06:57:17PM -0600, Jacob Bachmeyer wrote:
> This patch fixes some issues with the testsuite.
Excellent work. Thank you!
Cheers,
Ben
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
DejaGnu mailing list
DejaGnu@gnu.org
https://lists
On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 04:30:49PM -0600, Jacob Bachmeyer wrote:
> GDB has changed somewhat over the years; are the strings those
> modules seek still valid or do we need to accept both "old" and
> "new" message sets? Should DejaGnu eventually support GDB's MI
> mode, possibly in another module?
