My feeling is that the problem the patch is trying to solve is very
small. I prefer to maintain control over the version of the generated
files and move up to newer versions as I see fit. There is no
pressing need to be on the bleeding edge.
I have been the only person hacking the configury sinc
On 06/25/12 23:33, Sami Kerola wrote:
> Hello dejagnu maintainers,
>
> See attachment for rather large patch. I took liberty to remove all
> autofiles from git repository.
>
> $ git diff HEAD~1 --shortstat
> 52 files changed, 189 insertions(+), 45448 deletions(-)
>
> I described commit having t
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 12:53 PM, Ben Elliston wrote:
> Thanks for the patch. I think, though, that we are happy working with
> the tree the way it is (ie. not requiring casual developers to have
> the autotools installed).
Hi Ben,
IMHO it is not unreasonable expectation that upstream contribut
Hi Sami
Thanks for the patch. I think, though, that we are happy working with
the tree the way it is (ie. not requiring casual developers to have
the autotools installed).
Cheers, Ben
___
DejaGnu mailing list
DejaGnu@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mail
