Re: Debian patches: dejagnu's testsuite

> Is DejaGNU's testsuite useful? Yes, I'd rather not give up on it just yet. Thanks for the patches; applied. Cheers, Ben signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ DejaGnu mailing list DejaGnu@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/dejag

Re: Debian patch: diff files in different encodings

> Tore Morkemo reported that two files which print the same, one in > ISO-8859-1 and one in UTF-8, would not be detected by the "diff" > utility procedure. Here's the obvious fix. Applied; thanks. Ben signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___

Re: Debian patch: dejagnu.h typo fixes

> Does anyone really use this? :-) Patch is pretty obvious. Applied; thanks. Ben signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ DejaGnu mailing list DejaGnu@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/dejagnu

Re: Debian patch: more doc typos

> Some bugs that keen-eyed Debian users noticed. Applied, thanks! Ben signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ DejaGnu mailing list DejaGnu@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/dejagnu

Re: Debian patches: dejagnu's testsuite

Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > Thanks. Yeah, that's what I do too. I'm going to drop the patches I > posted from the Debian package, but the ones for host_exec in > particular might be generally applicable - it seems like the dejagnu > testsuite tests mostly that and the C header, neither of which a

Re: Debian patches: dejagnu's testsuite

On Sun, Apr 06, 2008 at 11:00:02AM -0600, Rob Savoye wrote: > Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > Is DejaGNU's testsuite useful? I admit, a strange question to have to > > Minimally useful. I think it's fair to say that almost nobody runs the > DejaGnu test suite, they run the GCC/GDB one to test Deja

Re: Debian patches: dejagnu's testsuite

Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > Is DejaGNU's testsuite useful? I admit, a strange question to have to Minimally useful. I think it's fair to say that almost nobody runs the DejaGnu test suite, they run the GCC/GDB one to test DejaGnu instead. - rob - __

Debian patches: dejagnu's testsuite

Is DejaGNU's testsuite useful? I admit, a strange question to have to ask about a testsuite for a test harness package, but the results have been pretty horrid every time I've tried it. I've attached some patches that I used in Debian to allow make check to pass. But in the end I had to turn the

Debian patch: more doc typos

Some bugs that keen-eyed Debian users noticed. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery 2008-04-06 Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * doc/user.xml (Adding a New Tool, Adding a New Target): Fix typos. * doc/dejagnu.texi: Regenerate. --- doc/dejagnu.texi |6 +++--- doc/user.

Debian patch: diff files in different encodings

Tore Morkemo reported that two files which print the same, one in ISO-8859-1 and one in UTF-8, would not be detected by the "diff" utility procedure. Here's the obvious fix. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery 2008-04-06 Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * lib/utils.exp (diff): Ope

Debian patch: dejagnu.h typo fixes

Does anyone really use this? :-) Patch is pretty obvious. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery 2008-04-06 Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * dejagnu.h (totals): Correct typos. --- dejagnu.h |4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) Index: dejagnu-1.4.4.cvs2006

Debian patch: DEJAGNU_TIMEOUT

Here's a patch we've been using in Debian for some time. The hardcoded "300" timeout is too small for various testsuites on some of our slower architectures. Instead of bravely attempting to clean up the million settings of "timeout", this patch just overrides the one that was giving us trouble;