>
> One thing we could easily change is to move the existing sorting
> operation into proc find. Then you could override proc find in your
> site.exp to return the *.exp files in any order you like.
>
> Does this seem reasonable?
>
> Ben
>
I am sorry Ben. Could you please tell me how to overr
>
> One thing we could easily change is to move the existing sorting
> operation into proc find. Then you could override proc find in your
> site.exp to return the *.exp files in any order you like.
>
> Does this seem reasonable?
>
> Ben
Yes. I am sorry I don't know I can override proc in my s
> You now have a sequence: 01.exp,02.exp,03.exp,04.exp. But mybe at
> one point you have follow another order
> 03.exp,01.exp,04.exp,02.exp. You must change the whole directory
> tree, at most times, it is not really you want.
One thing we could easily change is to move the existing sorting
operat
deckrider wrote:
> I'm having difficulty getting the simplest hello world example to
> pass, using the following, copied straight from the manual (I added
> the 'default' so I can get an idea as to when it fails):
Try using one of the examples in the source tree, I'm not sure if the
manual is 10
But even if you call files and directories by sequential numbers, you can not
test it crossingly( I do not know if this word is proper.)
I mean, take a case for example. You have a directory tree like that:
01_xx/01_yy/01.exp
01_xx/02_zz/02.exp
02_aa/01_bb/03.exp
02_aa/02_cc/04.exp
You now have
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [061214 05:28]:
> My work needs to test some cases before others, but I found Dejagnu didn't
> support it. It tests cases according to their directory order only. So
> I modified runtest.exp to achieve my tests order control. My code is not very
> mature, but
