Re: wnpp and bug owners

2003-09-24 Thread Colin Watson
On Sat, Sep 13, 2003 at 08:29:55AM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote: > * Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-09-12 23:35]: > > I'd like to commit the following patch to /devel/wnpp/. Any comments? > > Looks straight forward and reasonable to me. If it would be up to me I > would say "go ahead". O

Re: wnpp and bug owners

2003-09-15 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-09-12 23:35]: > I'd like to commit the following patch to /devel/wnpp/. Any comments? Looks good. -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: wnpp and bug owners

2003-09-13 Thread Gerfried Fuchs
* Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-09-12 23:35]: > I'd like to commit the following patch to /devel/wnpp/. Any comments? Looks straight forward and reasonable to me. If it would be up to me I would say "go ahead". >If you are going to adopt a package, retitle its bug >to repla

wnpp and bug owners

2003-09-12 Thread Colin Watson
So, we've now got bug ownership in the BTS, and it occurs that we could use this productively to improve the way wnpp bugs are managed. Up to now, when people "accept" an RFP or an RFA/O by retitling it to an ITP or an ITA respectively, sometimes they change the submitter address and sometimes they