Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Well, if you prepare text and code for it, I'll put it on the web
> > page. But the issue there is IMHO: How can the program dectect when
> > the title was changed? So, it needs to permanently track
Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Well, if you prepare text and code for it, I'll put it on the web
> page. But the issue there is IMHO: How can the program dectect when
> the title was changed? So, it needs to permanently track each bug.
Well, I can prepare text. ;) I'm not good at th
Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Thomas Bushnell BSG ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040809 22:55]:
> > Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Well, there is a list of ITA packages. Of course, you need to take a
> > > look into the bug report if you want to see whether it's O/ITA or
> >
* Thomas Bushnell BSG ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040810 10:25]:
> Automatically generated web pages listing the packages that are ITP or
> ITA, sorted by the length of time the ITP or ITA has been set. Each
> page would be like the current page of orphaned packages with a non-QA
> address, indicating th
* Thomas Bushnell BSG ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040809 22:55]:
> Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Well, there is a list of ITA packages. Of course, you need to take a
> > look into the bug report if you want to see whether it's O/ITA or
> > RFA/ITA.
> Where is this list?
See e.g.
http://l
Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > for any action; however, if I saw good reason from the history of a
> > > bug report to not do anything, then I didn't write mail at all.
>
> > By RFP you mean ITA?
>
> No, I meant: Request for Packages and Intend to Package.
Oh; I'm thinking spe
Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I did take 6 months for an ITP, and one year for a RFP as lower limit
> for any action; however, if I saw good reason from the history of a
> bug report to not do anything, then I didn't write mail at all.
By RFP you mean ITA?
I think six months and a
* Thomas Bushnell BSG ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040809 22:25]:
> Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I did take 6 months for an ITP, and one year for a RFP as lower limit
> > for any action; however, if I saw good reason from the history of a
> > bug report to not do anything, then I didn't w
* Thomas Bushnell BSG ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040809 11:55]:
> There used to be an established set of procedures for aging stale ITP
> and ITA wnpp entries, and setting them back to O.
I don't really remember that there was one. I did a cleanup of ITP /
RFP about a year ago.
What I did was:
* Going
There used to be an established set of procedures for aging stale ITP
and ITA wnpp entries, and setting them back to O.
As I recall, it was something like:
If the ITA or ITP is more than a month old, then:
QA/WNPP sends email asking if they still intend to package or need
help,
If no respons
10 matches
Mail list logo
