Re: Drew Scott Daniels in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> reopen 96694 =
> thanks
Oh well. Nobody did package it during the last 2 (4) years. Please let
that RFP just die...
Christoph
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.df7cb.de/cs/
Universität des Saarlandes, Compiler Design Lab
signature.asc
Description
* Drew Scott Daniels ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I'm just wondering if Majordomo/Majordomo2 would still be a useful
> package in Debian given that there's things like mailman, fml, ecartis
> and potentially other alternatives.
Erm, yes, of course it'd be a useful package to have in Debian.
On Sun, 2005-09-25 at 22:22 -0500, Drew Scott Daniels wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm just wondering if Majordomo/Majordomo2 would still be a useful
> package in Debian given that there's things like mailman, fml, ecartis
> and potentially other alternatives.
May I say alternatives rock the world?
Besides, Ma
Hi,
I'm just wondering if Majordomo/Majordomo2 would still be a useful
package in Debian given that there's things like mailman, fml, ecartis
and potentially other alternatives.
Drew Daniels
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [E
Your message dated Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:55:02 -0500 (CDT)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line WNPP bug closed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibili
witch @
On Sun, Aug 25, 2002 at 10:33:18PM +0100, Jonathan Amery wrote:
> How's the packaging going?
It's not. See:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=96694&msg=16&repeatmerged=yes
--
Met vriendelijke groet / with kind regards,
Guus Sliepen <[EMAIL PROTECT
How's the packaging going?
J.
On Tue, May 08, 2001 at 01:54:39AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > I thought it was removed from Debian because it had so many security
> > flaws.
>
> AFAIR it was removed at the end of the potato freeze because it had a
> known security hole with a known fix but upstream didn't release a new
> ver
I'm sorry, I forgot to mention that you can find the homepage of majordomo
with instructions to download the CVS version at:
http://www.hpc.uh.edu/majordomo/#mj2
Snapshots of the new majordomo version can be found at:
ftp://ftp.hub.org/pub/Majordomo2/
---
On Mon, 7 May 2001, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Guus Sliepen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20010507 21:55]:
> > I plan to package Majordomo version 2. It is the succesor of the
> > widely known Majordomo 1.94.5 mailing list manager, which is not in
> > Debian because the license is not DFSG complaint.
>
>
* Guus Sliepen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20010507 21:55]:
> I plan to package Majordomo version 2. It is the succesor of the
> widely known Majordomo 1.94.5 mailing list manager, which is not in
> Debian because the license is not DFSG complaint.
I thought it was removed from Debian because it had so m
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
I plan to package Majordomo version 2. It is the succesor of the widely known
Majordomo 1.94.5 mailing list manager, which is not in Debian because the
license is not DFSG complaint. However, I checked out the CVS version of
Majordomo 2 and they have radically chan
13 matches
Mail list logo
