Bug#946945: Maybe ruby-unidecode is not necessary at all

2019-12-27 Thread Daniel Leidert
Am Freitag, den 27.12.2019, 16:42 +0530 schrieb Utkarsh Gupta: > On 27/12/19 7:19 am, Daniel Leidert wrote: > > after I've read Matijs' comment I checked if we can use some more recent > > (and > > maybe already packaged) unidecoder gem. It seems to me that jekyll-import > > (again) does not use th

Bug#946945: Maybe ruby-unidecode is not necessary at all

2019-12-27 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
Hi Daniel, On 27/12/19 7:19 am, Daniel Leidert wrote: > after I've read Matijs' comment I checked if we can use some more recent (and > maybe already packaged) unidecoder gem. It seems to me that jekyll-import > (again) does not use the gem at all. I cannot find any reference to decode() > or > t

Bug#946945: Maybe ruby-unidecode is not necessary at all

2019-12-26 Thread Daniel Leidert
Hi, after I've read Matijs' comment I checked if we can use some more recent (and maybe already packaged) unidecoder gem. It seems to me that jekyll-import (again) does not use the gem at all. I cannot find any reference to decode() or the Unidecoder module. Maybe we don't need it at all? Regard