[Brian May, 2016-05-01]
> > please don't use python- prefix, use mkdocs-bootswatch. Note that binary
> > package is "mkdocs"
>
> Ok, so I just call both source *and* binary packages mkdocs-bootswatch
> and mkdocs-bootstrap then?
yes please
> mkdocs was required for a DPMT package - django-rest-f
> please don't use python- prefix, use mkdocs-bootswatch. Note that binary
> package is "mkdocs"
Ok, so I just call both source *and* binary packages mkdocs-bootswatch
and mkdocs-bootstrap then?
>> I plan to maintain this as part of the DPMT - Debian Python Modules
>> Team.
>
> I think PAPT is m
[Brian May, 2016-04-30]
> This is a requirement for python-mkdocs.
>
> Not sure if this prefix of python- is appropriate or not because this
> package doesn't contain any python, however it is part mkdocs, and the
> source of mkdocs which has been named python-mkdocs in Debian.
please don't use p
Hi!
On Sat, 2016-04-30 at 21:57:47 +1000, Brian May wrote:
> Would appreciate it if somebody could confirm that the license is BSD
> and if so what version of the BSD license this is.
>
> https://github.com/mkdocs/mkdocs-bootswatch/blob/master/LICENSE
That looks like a BSD-2 clause license but w
Would appreciate it if somebody could confirm that the license is BSD
and if so what version of the BSD license this is.
https://github.com/mkdocs/mkdocs-bootswatch/blob/master/LICENSE
setup.py declares the license as BSD, however in my current sleep
deprived state it looks different to the BSD l
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Brian May
* Package name: python-mkdocs-bootswatch
Version : 0.4.0
Upstream Author : Dougal Matthews
* URL : https://pypi.python.org/pypi/mkdocs-bootswatch/
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: HTML/CSS
Description
6 matches
Mail list logo
