Bug#821460: ITP: salt-formula-ceilometer -- Salt formula for OpenStack Ceilometer

2016-04-19 Thread Filip Pytloun
On 2016/04/19 10:39, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > On Tue, 19 Apr 2016, Filip Pytloun wrote: > > I think this is the same case as Puppet modules that are already > > packaged and maintained by PKG Openstack team. > > Right, I'm not sure if the packaging of those puppet modules was a good > idea either.

Bug#821460: ITP: salt-formula-ceilometer -- Salt formula for OpenStack Ceilometer

2016-04-19 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Tue, 19 Apr 2016, Filip Pytloun wrote: > I think this is the same case as Puppet modules that are already > packaged and maintained by PKG Openstack team. Right, I'm not sure if the packaging of those puppet modules was a good idea either. > This formula is part of openstack-salt project and u

Bug#821460: ITP: salt-formula-ceilometer -- Salt formula for OpenStack Ceilometer

2016-04-19 Thread Filip Pytloun
Hello, I think this is the same case as Puppet modules that are already packaged and maintained by PKG Openstack team. This formula is part of openstack-salt project and unlike other formulas that can be found on the Internet these has some more "fashion" like extensive documentation [1] covering

Bug#821460: ITP: salt-formula-ceilometer -- Salt formula for OpenStack Ceilometer

2016-04-19 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hi, On Mon, 18 Apr 2016, Filip Pytloun wrote: > * Package name: salt-formula-ceilometer > Version : 2016.4.1 > Upstream Author : tcpcloud > * URL : https://github.com/openstack/salt-formula-ceilometer > * License : Apache-2.0 > Programming Lang: SaltStack >

Bug#821460: ITP: salt-formula-ceilometer -- Salt formula for OpenStack Ceilometer

2016-04-18 Thread Filip Pytloun
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Filip Pytloun * Package name: salt-formula-ceilometer Version : 2016.4.1 Upstream Author : tcpcloud * URL : https://github.com/openstack/salt-formula-ceilometer * License : Apache-2.0 Programming Lang: SaltStack Desc